-1 points

Existing in the UK is work

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I’m a bit puzzled by “working age” being classed as 16-64. Is that an admission that a very large proportion of those between 64 and the state pension age (66 increasing to 68) are actually unable to continue in employment?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

For the vast majority of that group it’s more of a case they are economically restricted. Untreated mental health issues due to our health service, childcare needs that can’t be met if they work. Then being framed to be inactive feels disengenuous to people that would like nothing more than to be healthy happy and properly supported to work.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

My wife couldn’t for 8 years… Childcare was and still is a nightmare. She’s going to apply for her first job since we moved from Ireland. We had zero benefits etc all this time.

It’ll suck. Big part of her money will be spent on childcare. But we can no longer afford to live.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

And conveniently the way unemployment is counted these people are not included in the figure.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Hasn’t it been that way since unemployment was recorded anywhere in the world?

It’s just like disposable income. It doesn’t mean what people think it’s means.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

To some extent yes, but they’re always fiddling the way it’s counted in the UK to make it seem better.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 20K

    Comments