162 points

Aaaand it’s electron garbage.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Out of the loop, what’s wrong with electron?

permalink
report
parent
reply
151 points

It’s basically Chrome. It’s not a real application, it’s a website pretending to be one. It uses a metric fuckton of RAM and eats your battery faster than Prince Andrew a minor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points
*

If Firefox could allow their engine to be packaged like this I’d use it. The problem I see here is chromium. Everything is a trade off and we need more ways to build maintainable cross platform applications.

Slack, for example, is Electron and it runs great. One of the best apps I’ve used. And it works better than the browser version…

The hate on Lemmy of electron is a bit of an overreaction if you ask me. Yeah it uses more ram than is necessary but again everything is a trade off. Not everything can be a hard to maintain rust app. Let’s try to embrace cross platform solutions, though yes fuck chrome/google, so sure criticize that part of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I bought 32gb of RAM cause I was tired and gave up to eléctron apps

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But does it sweat though ;-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Each electron App is actually a full independent chromium browser install running a website. It’s easy to code for and works cross platform as a result, but it’s essentially just a website, although they can run offline depending on what’s been built in to the local app.

Each electron app running on your system is a separate full chromium app running, with no sharing of resources between each instance. So they take up a lot of space each and duplicate all the resource usage, and potentially the security flaws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

oh yikes. that sucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

It’s just the webapp. If we want the webapp we use a browser.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Slack desktop app is built with electron and works much better than the web app in my experience. So no it’s not actually always that simple.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This. Its webapp with more persistent storage maybe. If the Browsers could integrate this, it would be a gamechanger.

I am also very sure that Chrome preloads google. com to make it seem to “load faster”. Its all just preloading or persistent storage

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, I was dissapointed, but at least it is a controlled browser and not reliant on your normal browser which could change or have malicious extensions

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It’s what you deploy to your users if you want to work around ad blockers and browser extensions. It’s a great tool to get operating system level access to exfiltrate information about your users and identify them uniquely, even if they would prefer that not to happen.

All that with the help of Google’s telemetry engine aka Chrome, which further helps Alphabet to manifest their interpretation of web standards in the world.

We worked to move things onto the web. Now people bring the web back to your desktop with every application bringing it’s own browser shell. We have come full circle and we’re now using 10x the resources.

Electron is the prime example of everything that is wrong in IT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wow. That sounds horrible. Do you have a source about the system level access statement? I would like to see people’s thoughts on it, if it’s as bad as it sounds, I’m surprised I haven’t heard about it before

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There are other options like Tauri that do the same thing as electron, but instead of bundling chromium with the app, it relies on the OS provided web view. It’s also built with Rust, which tends to be faster.

As an example, Mac would use Safari, Windows would use Edge (chromium), and Linux would likely use WebKitGTK, which is what safari uses.

By using the default browser, developers save a ton of space—at the risk of compatibility issues, which are very very rare nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

WebKitGTK is only native for GTK desktops. On Qt desktops, you’d want QtWebEngine instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

interesting!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Everything

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Electron runs a core Chromium Browser + NodeJS + a bit more.

Unlike Chromium itself it is not backwards compatible and removes a ton of things like its sandboxing capabilities.

I am not sure how it is less secure, but it may use more RAM (also not always but generally yes of course), doesnt allow hardening (unlike android WebView apps) and breaks LD_PRELOAD-ing another memory allocator.

This is only a big problem in special cases, in general it makes apps strictly dependend on GNU glibc and others, no idea how it works on Alpine or others (that actually try to make a secure system).

If somebody knows more about security concerns about Electron, please add.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Ugh, I was looking forward to replacing Thunderbird/Bridge, but never mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Bridge

I am actually sort of worried that now that they put this out they will retire bridge. We will have to wait and see. Is having a browser tab open really that bad… ?? I suppose but I still like programs over web pages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I went here for this info. Thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How do you know it’s not Tauri?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The GitHub repository for the project is here, and the tagline of the repository is:

Desktop application for Mail and Calendar, made with Electron

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It says so in the repo

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

Yeah, Proton is awesome, that’s for sure. Now, being a “security and privacy” company, it blows my mind that they put so much effort on making apps for Windows and Mac first, leaving Linux behind, and when they finally get to it, they just dump in a glorified PWA. This world is really weird 🤣🤣

permalink
report
reply
19 points

And that they decided to go with RPM and DEB instead of just doing a Flatpak

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Are you kidding me? Doesn’t bother me that much, as I use Thunderbird with Protonmail bridge. I’m still waiting on Proton Drive for linux. Well, I’m gonna end up self hosting at this point. :(

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Tbh it should have simply been a flatpak

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I prefer rpm over flatpak. at least I know any os dependency updates are happening regularly, flatpak may not get weekly dependency updates from proton

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Its kinda annoying for anyone not on debian or fedora (and derivatives) though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

it blows my mind that they put so much effort on making apps for Windows and Mac first, leaving Linux behind

Because most people use Windows and Mac, including their clients. It’s not the world that is weird, it’s people who don’t understand such basic things. You don’t focus on 5% of your users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Capitalism is weird? Ok, but this is what we have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I had no idea the whole world was capitalist, but I guess I don’t know everything. And there’s the fact that I mentioned the world, not a form of political economy. But yeah, capitalism is weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s a native app on Windows and Mac?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I don’t use either OS, but the apps are .DMG (Mac) and .exe (Windows), so I believe they are, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

PWAs can be packed in .dmg and .exe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Are you confusing security and privacy?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m not, the comment I was replying to literally called proton a “security and privacy” company.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They mutually imply one another.

If something was private, but not secure, well, that implies there are ways to breach the privacy, which isn’t very private at all.

If it’s secure, but not private, that implies it’s readable by someone other than the consenting conversational parties, which makes it insecure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Companies have to comply with law enforcement. If anything, the little amount of data they were able to give after being forced is a good proof of their overall claim. If there is someone to blame here are courts using antiterrorism laws to catch environmental activists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

exactly if it’s a company they have to comply with laws. This is not a service to rely on if you doing espionage or something. It’s for people who want more privacy and choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I mean, if you want secure/private communication, email should not be your go-to. It’s a horrible platform by today’s standards. It was never designed to have any serious level of security. Once they have an unencrypted email on the target with timestamps and mail headers, all they need to do is see who was communicating with Proton at that point. I don’t know if anything has changed since the PRISM days, but back in the 2000s, they definitely had that level of insight into the web.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not much has changed. It’s really only secure if you are sending emails between addresses within the same local network like gmail to gmail. Thankfull with end to end encryption it can be pretty safe just good luck finding someone that knows how to use it. but thankfully proton makes that pretty seamless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s why I put “security and privacy” between quotes. I have absolutely Jo way to confirm if they are secure and private or if they’re not, other than all the contradicting mentions all over the internet. Also, while security and privacy may not be mutually dependent in the physical world, it stands to reason that something insecure cannot be private, and something not private is inherently insecure, as @pixelscript@lemmy.ml clearly pointed out. As for controlling my own email infrastructure, I’d love to, as everything else I do self-host, and only with FOSS software. However, email hosting is a seriously complicated animal that requires too much effort and maintenance, and most of us dont have the knowledge and time to invest in that, so compromises need to be made. I am well aware that there’s always risk on using something I have no real control over, but the alternative meets the reason for the phrase “the treatment is worse than the decease”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

“Finally” really is the key word, waiting for Proton to add features or apps is painful at times.

Glad they’ve finally made progress with this.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Waiting for Proton to acknowledge and fix critical bugs that can cause data loss was way more painful… took them years with the solution being “just wait for the bridge rewrite it will be (most likely) fixed there”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Its just a webview app…

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Yep. Installed it, started it, saw it is basically the website in an embedded browser, uninstalled it.

Like, come on, you have a web version. Why should I use an extra application to view a website. This seems like a cheap excuse for a desktop app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Does it support offline access?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

It does not. Which is the reason I wanted the app…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The only benefit i can see of web app is it is in a controlled browser environment…could be helpful with security?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To save myself the hassle of having to rebuild the electron app every once in a while? I’d rather not open my browser, go to their website and log in with 2fa every time I want to read an email.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The main benefit is since it is locally installed, it is harder for proton’s server to access your encrypted data by serving you malicious JS. A malicious desktop app/update could be served too, but that may be trickier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Speaking of mail apps, has anyone used Thunderbird recently? I had used it for a year or two up until . . . a year or two ago (probably two or three, actually) and then switched to kmail to satisfy my masochism. Thunderbird just hadn’t been doing it for me with meh functionality and slightly more meh looks.

Fast forward to yesterday when I’m updating my steamdeck desktop to use nix stuff instead of rwfus+pacman and I couldn’t get kmail from nix to behave right so I thought I’d give thunderbird another look. I’m several hours into tinkering with it and holy hell has it changed pretty much completely from a few years ago. Looks fantastic and works pretty much exactly how I want/expect it to. Good job mozilla!

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Thunderbird is fine.

Tbh I have no idea what they are doing though, they have more funding than GNOME but after Supernova I didnt see any updates.

See my list of flatpak repositories

There is an unofficial Thunderbird nightly Flatpak, that will likely reveal what the hell they are doing.

So Supernova is kinda nice, mainly a big overhaul of the underlying stuff, making it easier to maintain.

It lacks a ton of things like Threads (the addon TB Conversation works though). Also their “spaces” bar is useless, as it just opens tabs, so it is redundant. Good idea, but only if it could replace tabs.

Their search and filter stuff is still the same, really bad. Either displaced in the message list column, as the global search still opens a new tab which is kinda bad UI.

Some addons broke too, not a big deal though.

I have the feeling they removed nested filters, which is extremely bad, but filters still work.

Thunderbird works well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I believe I read somewhere they’re focusing heavily on the mobile app at the moment (or rather turning K-9 into their mobile app). Once they get that out, we’ll see where the desktop goes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That too but afaik thats a separate Android dev

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve never found Thunderbird search bad compared to alternatives, as long as I’m not looking to find content inside attachments. Really fast and responsive and being a desktop client without paginated results makes moving and deleting in bulk so much easier. Would love it to be as powerful as Voidtools Everything to get a bit more granular sometimes but otherwise pretty happy with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I mean, I think their global search is not that useful, while their inline mail list search is. So I have a cluttered UI with 2 search bars, to supplement the incomplete inline search.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes Thunderbird is getting really nice nowadays.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just started using Thunderbird again a couple of months ago. Like it! I never really stopped liking it, just stopped using it because all the webmail interfaces and “appification”.

Was just trying to get K-9 Mail working on my phone again (after years of using umpteen different apps) and it’s not as smooth as I remember.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I think they’re talking Kmail from the KDE app suite. I thought they meant K-9 mail.
Btw If I remember correctly K-9 mail is or is becoming Thunderbird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s taking them quite a while, but that usually means that the end result will be worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

If K-9 isn’t working well for you, try FairEmail. It’s one of my favourite email clients.

K-9 has gotten a LOT better over the past few months though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah I installed it recently on my widows and it is super sleek.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good job mozilla!

Mozilla don’t work on Thunderbird any more. It’s an independent project now. https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/thunderbird-faq#w_who-makes-thunderbird

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you like Thunderbird, I recommend checking out Betterbird fork as well that adds more features.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah I’ve started using it again the past year. I use Proton Bridge with Thunderbird, and it works well. Much prefer it to webmail interfaces.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

It’s not developed by mozilla anymore. they stopped updating it a couple years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s not true, the latest release was two weeks ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 7.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 179K

    Comments