I know a fair number of Conservatives that believe women and minorities should be excluded from voting. Not in dog whistle form either; just blatantly believe only white men should vote
Which shoudn’t be that surprising, this was the norm in many places until relatively recently. Women, people of color and poor people were never really meant to participate in the “democratic process” (at least as far as conservatives are concerned). The only reason why they were eventually allowed was because they fought for it and eventually, people in power got too scared not to give in a little bit until we are where we are today.
Maybe I’m too pessimistic, but to me, it’s surprising that there aren’t more conservatives with this view. Because the conservatives who support (basic) women’s rights are essentially saying “you violent lefties were right and correct in the past for fighting what you believe was right, but whatever you are doing right now goes too far for some reason”…
@braingetter is Caleb Pitts from Podcast About Lists. He’s a comedian and this is 100% irony. He is making fun of people who think like this.
“Braingetter”. If usernames were side quests, this one would remain unachieved indefinitely.
“Garbage Human”. Here you go! +100XP
Lol. „Braingetter.“ All girls are into girlie stuff like glitter and Minnie Mouse and this equals being stupid.
Tell me you never had sex before, without telling me you never had sex before…
Im more worried that hey says, girls - glitter - mini mouse and stickers, he prob likes them little to young.
As a woman in her 30s, I’m partial to glitter and stickers. But I also like swords, knives and axes…
Guys, buy your woman a sword!
I really HATE glitter, I call it, the devils semen You can find that fucking stuff in your ears years later even tho its never been close. Swords, yeah the’re cool
Nothing wrong with it, just that without you have no real insight into a fundamental aspect of humanity. So you might end up suggesting that women should lose their rights and be treated as literal children / property.
I just don’t think one has anything to do with the other. Sex isn’t anything magical that nets you wisdom or insight into not being a misogynic prick.
Just no.
Wanting women to lose their right => not having sex because you are an asshole
This is the correct implication. Not having sex doesn’t imply anything about the former:
It is snowing => it is cold
It is cold =/=> it is snowing
(Note: the => arrow is an implication. A => B stands for A implies B, meaning if A is true then B must be true, however B can be true regardless of whether A is true)
If you propose some type of intelligence test for voting to these same guys, they immediately back off. It’s only a good rule to them if they automatically qualify. :)
Here’s an easy test:
- Should women be allowed to vote?
- Should anyone in the LQTBQ+ community be allowed to vote?
- Should any person of color (PoC) be allowed to vote?
- Should former convicts be allowed to vote?
If they answer no to any of these, they’re disqualified from voting themselves.
