22 points

Room temperature superconductors are right up there with fusion technology. Both are going to dramatically change the way the world works. Lossless transmission lines will save so much energy.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

If the recent Korean paper isn’t a scam it’s pretty huge. Even if it isn’t as big as announced (like a very low but positive resistance) it can already be a game changer for some applications

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Assuming it’s real, and depending on the future size, it could do faster CPUs without heat loss. So you would pack more silicon more densely without worrying about waste heat. Transmission lines would be more efficient. We lose something like 30 to 40% of our generated energy to transmission lines. So massive massive if it’s true

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

total upgradable laptop like Framework 16

permalink
report
reply
14 points
*

Micro LEDs.

Consider an OLED, but no drawbacks, lower power consumption and no burnin. Already available but currently extreme expensive. (Samsung in korea sells one if i recall)

Solid state batteries.

More range on electric cars. Faster charging. Lower (or no?) Risk of fire, if poked. (Reminds me of the old subreddit “spicypillows”). Supposedly arriving in toyota cars by 2027.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Carbon capture technology. Because the world needs it bad

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

I’m hoping suncells and batteries will become really good, so it’s possible to drive your house electricity on only the sun. Would be truly liberating.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superconducting_magnetic_energy_storage

This at scale with a room temperature superconductor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

it is already something you can do, if you put enough solar panels

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah I guess but then you need a big roof probably. I was hoping they could be more efficient to double their performance, so half the space could be used (and possible half the cost).

But we will see :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There is not much room for optimization left. Best solar cells get close to 23% efficiency, apparently the current theoretical maximum is a little over 30%.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shockley–Queisser_limit

permalink
report
parent
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it’s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 319K

    Comments