3 points

Damn, this looks like China’s Internet Real-name System

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Seems like Putin is trying to recreate the CCP’s great firewall to hide the scope of his failure in invading Ukraine. It kind of reminds me of the last days of the USSR when they tried desperately to hide how bad the situation was. I’m curious how he technically plans to prevent foreign VPN use, he could create lists of known servers but my understanding is that VPN traffic is encrypted and not able to be identified as such, and of course he’s incapable of stopping starlink or similar satellite internet access.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It is possible to detect if traffic is being tunneled through a VPN with deep packet inspection. The great firewall actually does this and blocks popular VPN protocols like wireguard. However its possible to bypass the firewall by hiding/masking the traffic as being HTTPS data (like visiting a website) with software like shadowsocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Putin has signed new laws that will decimate online anonymity

So Putin is going to remove 10% of online anonymity?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Putin forces 90% of online anonymity to murder the remaining 10%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Decimate means remove 90% right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not originally when it was a punishment for legions that fled in battle. Every ten men would draw lots and one of them would be killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Starting this year, internet platforms must verify new users’ identities via state-approved systems, before granting access. VPN circumvention advice will constitute a crime, certain Gmail use will be banned, and non-state-approved hosting companies will be rendered illegal.

Since its invasion of Ukraine in February, Russian Members of Parliament and lawmakers have taken turns to see who can come up with the most aggressive anti-Western legislative proposals.

Maybe “anti-Western” isn’t the best term. That kind of seems likely to hurt the Russian public more than the West.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

Let’s hear the defense, Tankies. Tell us why this is a good thing.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

I’m not a tankie, but I don’t think that the idea of justifying political repression in Russia is likely to be much of a challenge. The Bolsheviks justified single-party rule and their own political repressions for a long time. If you’re a tankie, you’re presumably already willing to accept that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguardism

Vanguardism in the context of Leninist revolutionary struggle, relates to a strategy whereby the most class-conscious and politically “advanced” sections of the proletariat or working class, described as the revolutionary vanguard, form organizations to advance the objectives of communism.

The notion of a ‘vanguard’, as used by Lenin before 1917, did not necessarily imply single-party rule. Lenin considered the Social-Democrats (Bolsheviks) the leading elements of a multi-class (and multi-party) democratic struggle against Tsarism.[7] For a period after the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks (now renamed the Communist Party) operated in the soviets, trade unions, and other working-class mass organisations with other revolutionary parties, such as Mensheviks, Social-Revolutionaries and anarcho-communists, and local soviets often elected non-Bolshevik majorities.[8] Lenin did consider the Bolsheviks the vanguard insofar as they were the most consistent defenders of Soviet power (which he considered the dictatorship of the proletariat or ‘Commune-state’).[9] However, the situation changed drastically during the Russian Civil War and economic collapse, which decimated the working class and its independent institutions, and saw the development of irreconcilable conflicts between the Bolsheviks and their rivals. At the 10th Congress of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks) in 1921, the Party made the de facto reality de jure by outlawing opposition parties and formalising single-Party rule.[10]

The impetus for having a vanguard party was used by the Bolsheviks to justify their suppression of other parties. Their rationale was that since they were the vanguard of the proletariat, their right to rule could not be legitimately questioned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No tankie worth their salt would say it’s a good thing, lol. Being anti-NATO doesn’t immediately mean someone is pro-Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

And tankies aren’t worth salt as it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think the others missed that memo

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

There are lots of pro-Putin Tankies. Lots and lots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Funnily enough that’s what the right-wing nuts and left-wing nuts in Germany have in common. We’re living in the strangest timeline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

(I’m implying that you, as many others, equate “tankies” with “communists”)

That’s why I restricted to only those worth their salt. Russian-right-wing larpers aren’t welcome in any communist group.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Just other pro genocidal super stars of 1900s?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you implying killing Nazi soldiers during ww2 was bad?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments