In a pair of significant decisions, the Florida Supreme Court ruled Monday to uphold a 15-week ban on abortion in the state, while also allowing a proposed amendment that would enshrine abortion protections in the state constitution to appear on the November ballot.

The conservative-leaning court’s decision on the 15-week ban also means that a six-week abortion ban, with exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother, that Gov. Ron DeSantis signed into law last year will take effect.

But the bench’s ruling to allow the constitutional amendment to appear on the ballot this fall means voters will have a chance in just seven months to undo those restrictions.

Republicans have made multiple moves over the nearly two years since the U.S Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade to restrict access to abortion.

33 points

Well, this is certainly one way to make Florida a swing state again.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Given how popular DeSantis is in Florida, why do we think voters will do anything differently?

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Don’t forget that in Kansas they thought the same thing and then the choice amendment won 60/40%.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Florida still has a lot of dem voters, and passing an amendment to the FL constitution requires approval from I believe 65% or more of voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m an asshole in Florida that came ( I’m dumb I know) after that monster was elected and I’m voting against anything the right wants.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Hes not that popular he’s barely won his first election and the second one half of the dems who voted the first time didn’t even cast a vote. His popularity was media hype only and now he’s unpopular you don’t even hear his name anymore. All the stuff getting passed now is just leftover from when he had pull. All of this shit will get over turned in quick order when dems take the state

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I tend to have a difficult time finding how they start the clock on these bans. Do they go from conception, or the typical way doctors use which is from the start of the last period? It makes a difference of about two weeks

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Your problem is that you’re trying to use logic here. They’ve clearly demonstrated that they don’t care. They want a total ban and they’ll use whatever weasle words, workarounds, and loopholes to make it so complicated that by the time you realize you’re pregnant and don’t want the pregnancy for any reason (including the guaranteed death of mother and fetus) that it’s too late to change anything

permalink
report
parent
reply

My understanding is that they’re all from the last period.

I’d love to see the legislators that pass these bills quizzed on the subject. You ban it at 6 weeks, what does the baby look like at 2 weeks? I bet none of them respond, it may not have even been conceived yet.

It’s not policy that’s rationally decided, it’s theater to woo evangelical Christian’s whose religion exists to persecute others while claiming they themselves are being persecuted.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The one that hurts women more

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Also, “in case of rape”? Does that require a conviction for rape, which even in fairly slam dunk cases takes more than the length of the pregnancy? Does the woman have to file a police report and then be able to get an abortion? Do they just have to tell the doctor they were raped? What does “except in cases of rape, etc” mean, practically?

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments