14 points

The goal is to get it as hot as McDonald’s coffee

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Just hot enough to fuse labias shut

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

In fusion reactors there is a lot of talk about the temperatures they reach and the time it manages to work, but all this corresponds more to propaganda publications. The real problem is achieving net energy production and at this point they are not much further ahead than the fusion reactor built by a boy in a garage a few years ago. Achieving nuclear fusion is not that complicated, it is complicated to do it by extracting more energy than invested and this is still a minimum of 10 years away.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

The main parameter that determines if a fusion reactor generates net power is called its triple product, equal to the product of the plasma density, temperature, and confinement time. So setting records of time spent at operating temperatures is making important progress towards net power production.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

It feels like there’s a lot more positive stories coming out about fusion lately :)

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Shoot, maybe it’s finally 9 years away

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Let’s call it 9 years away from next year

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The only thing fusion can’t do is leave the lab.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Does this contribute to warming the planet? 😁

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Testing and stuff probably does by a tiny fraction, because they need to use insane amounts of power to get it started which is probably produced by coal/oil.

But once it’s actually working and producing more power than it consumes it will be the best solution to stopping greenhouse gases for energy production. It would be the end of gas/oil/coal in the energy sector. Probably wouldn’t even need to use solar or wind anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It warms one small part of the planet by about 100 million degrees.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

It really throws off the average though

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Temperature is an average

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hopefully it will contribute to warm up everyones home one day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

No, nuclear is a viable addition to other clean energy initiatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Particularly nuclear fusion, which doesn’t generate long-lived radioactive isotopes as byproducts of energy production. Nuclear fission still has a place to be sure, but once we crack the dilemmas with fusion all bets are off when it comes to generating huge amounts of clean energy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Fission gets a bad rap. The amount of waste it produces is minuscule compared to the amount of waste generated by fossil fuels, and it’s generally easier to deal with too. Just needs actual proper maintenance and care.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments