19 points

I wonder what percentage of desktop users still use Ubuntu nowadays. Seems like there’s no way to have a clear picture, besides DistroWatch which is more like “interest” and not actual usage?

permalink
report
reply
18 points

At my work, Ubuntu was the only Linux distro that was used on the desktop.
Some of my relatives use Linux, all Ubuntu.
The only other person I know who uses something else is also a hardcore nerd and professional sysadmin. He uses OpenSUSE.

Outside of the tech bubble, Ubuntu is still synonymous with Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Everyone I know IRL who uses Linux uses Ubuntu. Sample size of 5.

The corpo I work for uses both Windows and Ubuntu for software development workstations. Lately a lot more Ubuntu than Windows. That’s a sample size of a thousand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The official distro at my job is rhel.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, that’s pretty much the only other option for corpos.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t think the people excited about Linux are using or talking about Ubuntu, though, which probably skews people’s perceptions if they’re on Lemmy and Reddit a lot. Enthusiast spaces have all the “I run arch btw” people and even weirder and more obscure distros.

This is exactly the thing. 10 years ago when I was in college, everybody just used Ubuntu for laptops, and nowadays I don’t hear about it at all. I had the impression it kinda died, but seems like things are more or less the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I still use it. With all its faults, I still think it’s the best distro out there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

As a fellow Ubuntu user, I think there are distros that are technically superior. But at some point I just got tired of chasing the best option. I just want an operating system that works on all devices I install it to, and that listens to my commands. Ubuntu does that just fine. I love what they’ve done with GNOME, its ram usage is minimal (1.4GB), apps launch fast, snap is nicer to use than flatpak (which I can install with a single command), and if I wanted to I can stick to an LTS for up to 12 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m not a big fan of snaps myself. While it’s being used for desktop apps, it was originally intended for system or server apps. And I don’t like that it automatically updates applications. I’m sure there are scenarios where using snaps make sense, but I prefer to be in control of my servers and what’s running in them.

FlatpaksI think are more practical. It’s easier to install desktop apps with flatpaks. However there are some technical limitations apparently. You can lose some functionalities due to how it’s implemented.

But for everything else, yeah. Ubuntu works ootb with practically every hardware out there and there is a huge library and community of support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Out of genuine curiosity, what makes you think so?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s just so easy to use. Supports many devices and has lots of documentation.

Whatever system I’ve found. Whatever the scenario. I install Ubuntu and it just works ootb. It supports practically all hardware with some rare exceptions. It has great documentation and a large community of users to help fix problems. And when problems happen it’s mostly because I fucked up doing something wrong.

And I like that is backed by a company that takes Linux seriously and works hard at making it an actual solution for both desktops and servers. Fedora would come as a very close second in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

It’s the universal operating system, with long term support (10 years 🤯) and a few quality of life improvements. It runs well on all my hardware, VMs and containers (that I build). It’s got perfect desktop defaults for me. It’s the defacto standard Linux OS. It’s supported by every software developer or vendor who supports Linux. The corpo behind it is not public (yet) and not hell bent on profit extraction. There’s an obvious migration path from it to the universal operating system (Debian), should something terrible happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I personally have Xubuntu on multiple machines (I think 3 currently?) And Ubuntu server with i3wm on a 4th.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I haven’t touched Ubuntu for years, but I bet it’s still popular with new linux users and there are probably plenty other people who don’t care about the snap issues.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I’m running 22.04.4 Server with kernel 6.5.0-27 and everything is rock solid.

Any reason I should upgrade when stable 24.04 releases? It doesn’t seem to me that there is, but I’m worried missing something.

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

Nah, if you’re on LTS, the recommended upgrade is at XX.04.1, which typically comes around July. And 22.04 doesn’t go end of life until April of 2027, so there’s no mad rush to upgrade if you’re happy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Insightful. Your comment made me smile :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

If you don’t already see a reason, you probably don’t have one, especially for a server. Especially if you sign up for the Ubuntu Pro free tier, you have 10 years to come up with one. 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe the newer kernel? But if you don’t think you need it you’re probably fine tbh

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

To be pedantic, you can’t upgrade to a new LTS the moment it releases (unless you force it). It’s offered to users running the old LTS after 6 months IIRC. It’s possible to start with 24.04 from scratch, but you can’t upgrade for a while.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ah right. I didn’t know that - thank you. Only really got into self hosting in the last couple of year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Does it have the option of using TPM to unlock a LUKS2 encrypted partition like the previous betas? Or was that dropped?

permalink
report
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 7.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.5K

    Posts

  • 179K

    Comments