79 points

Just so everyone know how much of a blue-collar employment apocalypse this would be: “trucker” is the number one job title in most US states, and literally the last decent paying job you can get without a degree in most of them.

Automating it away–without a transition plan because fuck the poor–will devastate most of the Midwest and the South, as well as much of Canada.

If you think you have a problem with angry disenfranchised men now, just wait.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Would be cool if they could direct their anger towards the responsible parties this time. Unfortunately I’m sure it will somehow be “illegals are driving all our trucking routes.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

This is why I’m so pro basic income.

Giving people their basic needs met (food, home, safety).

Right now, the angriest folk are suffering and pointing the finger at the rest of the disenfranchised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t know if having their needs met would make them immune to brainwashing from Fox, though. Many of the insurrectionists had jobs that paid them enough to be comfortable and they still attacked the capitol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Think of all the businesses that rely on truckers. Truck stops, motels, even some restaurants. Automating trucking hurts a lot more than just truckers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Work in transport. We have a severe lack of truck drivers in the US and a severe need. A few years ago the Prez of Texas Trucking Association stated he’s encouraging his son not to go into the biz because of the tough work requirements. He is very clear that trying to hire new drivers is hard. The industry acknowledges connected vehicles with semi autonomous trailers and trucks can support the dire need to move product. In certain circumstances autonomous driving can be useful and reasonably safe. Highways are usually well lit, well marked and well signed. This all helps improve autonomous vehicle safety.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

literally the last decent paying job you can get without a degree in most of them.

Relatively decent paying. Most truckers are still contractors with the company they ship for, so they’re paying for their own truck and its maintenance, they have few benefits, awful working hours, typically horrid management, and an extremely unhealthy lifestyle because of the nature of the job.

It’s an industry that is incredibly harmful to the people working it. We should automate it away, but it sucks that it’ll come at the cost of people’s livelihoods and at the profit of the few company owners. Same story as ever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

This is how I’ve always felt about automation. Why keep doing the menial, shit jobs that are harmful to people’s health? Why continue wasting time in meaningless repetitive jobs?

Let us get more time back to live our lives, let us share in the production gains brought about by automation. Let us have meaningful lives outside of just our capacity to produce profits for corporations.

Except the ruling class won’t let that happen. We’re still fighting just to work from home for jobs that can be done entirely from home.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Ohh no! Those pesky results of our actions catching up with us!

The south, Midwest, and SW outside of Texas has pretty much done this to themselves. I get that good people are affected here outside their spheres of influence but these states might try education or some shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Oh my god can we please just have more trains?

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

The US and Canada actually make pretty extensive use of freight rail already, more so than Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yes but we probably use as much as we can given our infrastructure, which is due for an upgrade.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Monkey’s paw: granted, but safety regulations still weakened so you get ~ 5x the derailment and explosions we already do

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
2 points

I knew it was Johnny O before I clicked on it and I’m so glad I was right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Teehee whoops I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Trains make a lot of sense for cargo moving ascoss more than 1-2 provinces/states, and shoukd be the first choice for that.

But for stuff moving only a couple hundred kilometers or less, and to all the places where there aren’t rails, you still need trucks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That accurately describes the state we’re in today, it is that way (requiring trucks for a significant leg of the “last mile”) due to the incredible amount of subsidizing being done for road maintenance.

Imagine if we were subsidizing rail infrastructure for freight and passenger service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

This highlights an issue with trains. Why are building robot trucks cheaper than getting competition in the rail market?

(Roads are largely free to use and public, versus near monopolies on rail track use.)

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Roads go everywhere you want to go, and it’s worth sending a truck for a much smaller load than a train

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

This isn’t about last mile trucking though, this is about long-haul trucking.

That said, considering trains are getting longer and longer and with fewer and fewer employees on board, I’m not sure that even more freight by rail is a good solution either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The rail industry would be much better off being better regulated and with large rail companies broken up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

While it may be more efficient (in time, energy, labor) to have something make most of its long haul journey on a train, I have to think that the time between “I need to send this” and “it is moving” is much shorter with trucking than with trains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s also an article somewhere around here about an attempted renaissance in shipping. They headlined the Great Lakes, but included that Chicago could be a hub connecting the Great Lakes to the Mississippi River system- together those cover a huge portion of the US

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Pretty much answering your last paragraph: Relevant John Oliver segment

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Roads go anywhere you build them.

Rails go anywhere you build them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Roads are a lot more flexible though. Tractors also use roads for example. As to bicycles and pedestrians.

Note that the above is about very rural areas where seeing 4 of the above per hour on any stretch is busy. As you start scaling up density it makes sense to separate uses, and trains quickly become the best option for various reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The best option is what Europe has been trying to do by decoupling track ownership from companies running the trains. However, that would likely mean a government takeover of all tracks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Just do it

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s weird to me that a company can own a train line which cuts though the country and needs maintenance. Like imagine if they owned roads…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like imagine if they owned roads…

Oh, that’s been happening in some parts of the world. Well, at least highways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The vehicles have drawn skepticism from safety advocates, who warn that with almost no federal regulation, it will be mainly up to the companies themselves to determine when the semis are safe enough to operate without humans on board. The critics complain that federal agencies, including the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, take a generally passive approach to safety, typically acting only after crashes occur. And most states provide scant regulation.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

What could go wrong?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d be willing to bet you l3 systems, limited to highway miles, have a better track record than humans, especially in long hauls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Ideally, sure.

Companies: “They’re safe! Trust us! It’s a total coincedence that we have a huge profit motive in them being you thinking they’re safe!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Regulation will probably get pushed to insurance. Someone has to ensure these trucks in case of accidents, with either the company or an insurer paying out in cases of accidents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I remember watching that scene on the highway in Logan with all the self-driving trucks and thinking, “this is our terrifying future too, isn’t it?”

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I wish. A school of justice and equality defending mutants is still nowhere to be found.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I just meant that specific scene, not the whole movie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s a shame. We could really use some X-Men these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The funniest part is that they didn’t stop (when it’s pretty easy to code that in). They just raised alarms telling the person your gonna get hit. Idk if I misunderstood that though but it fitted with the dystopia vibes they were going.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 409K

    Comments