We could also use the descriptor, “anti-genocide” for these protests, but that’s a bit on the nose I guess.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Montreal protesters set up about 20 tents Saturday afternoon with the intent of staying on McGill University’s lower field “indefinitely.”
They joined a wave of pro-Palestinian demonstrations held on campuses across the U.S. who want to see universities divest from companies with business ties to Israel.
Zeca Eufemia, a McGill student and teaching assistant who was among those protesting, said the encampment had, indeed, tripled in size, as the university statement claimed.
Sasha Boucher, a member of the Revolutionary Communist Party who was not a McGill student but said he was at the encampment in solidarity with Palestinians, said the protesters felt support from the general public.
Nanre Nafziger, an assistant professor in McGill’s department of integrated studies in education, said she came to the encampment to support the protesting students.
Pearl Eliadis, a human rights lawyer and associate professor at McGill, told CBC Montreal’s Daybreak in an interview that the university may go to court to seek an injunction to have the protesters removed.
The original article contains 604 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
The police will probably use force to clear the protest. It’s hard to protest for peace if you use force to keep protesting…
I hear that Hamas listens to liberal college students from Western countries. It’s really their core demographic.
What did we learn when the trucker convoy occupied downtown Ottawa? We learned that a protest and an occupation are not the same thing. I don’t know what the acceptable length of a protest should be, but the trucker convoy showed that 3 weeks was way too long.
That’s a false equivalence if I’ve ever heard one.
- The trucker convoy was based on sovereign citizen nonsense and conspiracy theories. This protest is against genocide.
- The convoy shut down whole blocks of downtown, creating a dangerous zone of lawlessness and people shitting in the snow. This protest doesn’t prevent university business, and is law abiding and sanitary.
- The convoy stored thousands of pounds of propane and diesel fuel within mere meters from Parliament combined with idiots shooting fireworks, and this protest has zero chance of literally blowing up parliament.
- The convoy was so dangerous that the police didn’t even dare enter to enforce laws, the OPS police chief repeatedly said there is nothing they could do without endangering officers, student protests like this are routinely and often brutally stopped by police action without any threat of harm or injury to the police.
So no, I don’t think they’re equivalent in any way. I hope these protestors continue until they’re successful without having their right to peaceful assembly curtailed unjustly.
You are making a lot of assumptions there. I’m not saying the two protest groups are equivalent. I’m saying that uninvolved people only have so much patience for disruption. Protester’s don’t have the right to occupy someone else’s property or engage in the prolonged disruption of other people’s rights. The University is private property and no one has a right to occupy it. The protesters are trespassing. Legal protest is about making your voice heard. It is not about using your presence to force the issue your way. That’s illegal and rightly so.
I’m guessing you don’t have a lot of experience with student protests? They are very common in Montréal, there is nothing extraordinary about this one.
And McGill’s property is semi-private. The university recieves public funds, has easements with the city, and does PIL instead of property tax. So it’s not as clear cut and dry as say, someone’s kitchen.
