26 points

Gotta love when they see Portugal as a model but refuse to actually implement the same model, then complain “the model doesnt work!!!”

permalink
report
reply
17 points

That’s exactly what happened in Oregon, where they only took half measures and then bitched and complained that it didn’t work. They recently are recriminalizing hard drugs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

That’s what’s happening in Germany right now. with cannabis.

They legalized it on April 1st and at the same time somehow not. They call it partial legalization. You can have 25g in public and theoretically smoke weed in public. but not in sight to schools, playgrounds, sports clubs, etc. All around there is a 100m spell. In cities that’s like everywhere .And you’re not allowed to smoke in front of children. The law is so vague that it can be in such a way that you have to change the side of the street when a child comes towards you. Or you would have to put out the joint.In reality, it is very difficult to really consume 100% publicly.

At home you can grow up to 3 plants. But you may only have 50g of dried material, the rest must be destroyed. You are not allowed to make chemical extracts . You can only buy in cannabis social clubs which are allowed to be at. You must be a registered member there. You can buy 50g a month there. The cherry on top at the moment is that the CSC are only allowed to start in July, so there will only be harvests at the end of the year. Since you can’t have any selfgrow yourself since the beginning of April, you can’t have legal weed yet.

The whole law is planned to make it fail. You can later say ‘we tried’. And make it impossible to really legalize for the next few decades.

Edit: You cannot sell or share any material. To a party you have to smoke your own joint.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All around there is a 100m spell. In cities that’s like everywhere .

Its out of sight, but at most 100m. So if you’re not visible where you smoke you’re fine.

you can’t have legal weed yet.

Online apothecary is a way but also growing before April has been retroactively legalized. So as long as the police can’t proof you imported it illegally it’s also fine.

The law is not perfect, but its the best possible outcome given the political realities and i think of it as dooropening with further reforms still coming.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Farce is always a farce.

Appeasement then return to old way, this is the playbook of choice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oregon Dems didn’t want it so they sabotaged the whole thing by never funding any treatment centers, allowing the problem to get worse, and then acting like ‘heroes’ right before the coming election by banning it again and giving the funding to cops. This is the same shitty liberalism that gave us a genocide supporting Democratic president. We really need to do away with these two parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Thats BC politics in a nutshell, really.

The same thing happened in Victoria when they converted that hotel to make permanent housing for the homeless while offering basically no social support for those people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s by design

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

That headline is terrrrible. They wanna rollback public use. Still decriminalized otherwise.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

It’s not the only article I’ve seen that is misframing this.

I have no problem with banning hard drug use in public. Or even just smoking weed in public, since many people don’t like the smell. I’m fine only using cannabis in the privacy of mine and other’s homes. I’m not a teenager.

It’s throwing people in jail and then possibly prison for using that’s the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Knowing I can drive from A to B with it to enjoy in private is a HUGE change and relief.

Not to say I haven’t gone for walks on acid in very large parks, but I’m also not making an ass of myself or being disruptive. Making people upset with me would probably put a huge downer on the trip. I just wanna see and be in nature. Being drunk in public isn’t allowed either, you still gotta keep yourself together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yeah, assuming the best intentions from everyone, you would still expect some adjustments would be necessary to any new policy as they see the affect of the policy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 227K

    Comments