57 points

It’s fur-ee-OH-sah, not fur-ee-oh-SAH!

permalink
report
reply
29 points

RON STOP

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Measuring it against Fury Road is an almost impossible task. If it’s a “stunning powerhouse” then it should be just fine.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

The trailer didn’t interest me at all with the overuse of CGI

permalink
report
reply
14 points

It is typical for trailers to be released while production is still in progress. Fury road had a TON of CGI, but it’s impossible to tell because by release the work was completed. People don’t realize how much CGI goes into movies these days and assume it’s all practical FX.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s a mix of practical and VFX. The VFX production team on Fury road was huge. The reality is good CGI is impossible to discern from practical. There’s more to VFX than green screens.

No CGI is just invisible CGI

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I thought so too. It was really disappointing compared to all the amazing practical effects in Fury Road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

See my above comment, but fury road had a TON of CGI (maybe half or more of the action shots). People don’t realize it because by the time the movie drops production is complete and good cgi is just invisible CGI. The production on Furiosa Is still in progress when the trailer was released.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I would like to see a source regarding the TON of CGI effects used in Fury Road, because everything I’ve read and seen about it states the complete opposite.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVdo1xUDMAQ

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t think you’re completely accurate here. Do you have anything backing up your claim on the amount of CGI?

Fury Road is pretty well documented for using an inordinate amount of practical effects. Vehicles, costumes, explosions, etc. As far as I know, the most CGI was for the background/landscapes of scenes. And Furiousa’s hand of course. The quantity and the quality of CGI in Furiosa is my issue

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Fury road is up there with some of my favorites, so yeah I was disappointed.

I read it’s because the director is really getting up there in age and didn’t want to make production as long as the first, but who knows the real reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s not that it’s CGI that really bothered me, it’s that it’s not good CGI. I got the same feeling watching the trailer as I did the Hobbit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

George Miller is almost 80 now and the movie was partly shot during the pandemic. It was always going to be much more CG heavy than Fury Road. Doesn’t mean it’s bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I saw the trailer on youtube when it first dropped and it legit worried me. I saw the same trailer again before Dune 2 and it looked significantly better, which was a bit encouraging. I do understand where you’re coming from though, and feel much the same myself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For me, it wasn’t the CGI so much as the bad green screen and compositing. CGI doesn’t even need to enter into it if you get the fundamentals wrong, and that part stuck out even in the trailers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s fine, Fury Road would be difficult to top, I’ll be happy if it gets close.

It’s a pity Brendan McCarthy isn’t involved - his wild designs really help make Fury Road stunning.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The embargo broke for social media reactions to Furiosa, the eagerly anticipated prequel to the 2015 stunner Mad Max: Fury Road.

Early social reactions can sometimes be a bit different (typically more enthusiastic) than official critic reviews, and surely there are many more to come soon.

But based on the first batch Monday evening, Furisoa is a visual stunner with “ferocious, wild and unrelenting” action and a story that “spans decades,” with strong performances from the two leads.

Furisoa is in “a different gear” and “won’t match Fury Road’s splendor” in a way that “might frustrate” some audiences.

Different than is not necessarily bad, however, and this might be a case of viewers having a tough time shaking off their expectations going into the theater (the Furiosa trailers, after all, sell the new film as being rather exactly like Fury Road).

In any case, many consider Fury Road one of the best action films ever made — certainly one of the best this century — so any comparison, even one where Furiosa comes up a notch or two short, is still complimentary.


The original article contains 296 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 39%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply

movies

!movies@lemm.ee

Create post

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have “English” selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

  • Discussion threads to discuss about a specific movie or show
  • Weekly threads: what have you been watching lately?
  • Trailers
  • Posters
  • Retrospectives
  • Should I watch?

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments