120 points

This is great news since it officially establishes that Johnson has a dependency on Democrats now. Which gives Dems more leverage because if Johnson refuses to cooperate on something in the future than Dems could bring a motion to vacate the chair.

permalink
report
reply
70 points

Yeah, I was frustrated with Greene saying “Democrats saved him,” because with the infinitesimal majority they have, it would be the Democrats who ousted him if they voted the other way. Republicans basically have no agency in their choice of Speaker anymore, thanks largely to the chaos and dysfunction caused by her faction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

It also shows how toothless the extreme MAGA side is. Democrats and moderate Republicans made bipartisan deals to get aid passed and this troglodyte can’t abide compromise. She genuinely thinks compromise is evil.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I think you’re giving her too much credit. She just wants chaos and attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Correct. She must be fuming because she thought she had that kind of power - and she doesn’t.

I have a small sliver of suspicion that many Democrats voted to help Johnson in order to put her in her place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Wake up, babe. New voting coalition just dropped.

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points

Can they also just reject her?

permalink
report
reply
46 points
*

No sooner than Greene triggered the vote on her motion to vacate the speaker from his office, the Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise countered by calling first for a vote to table it.

An overwhelming majority, 359-43, kept Johnson in his job, for now.

The House voted nearly immediately to resolve something. How often does that happen? That is a resounding rejection.

There are mechanisms for Congress to expell members, but that’s unlikely to come up Santos for her.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The House voted nearly immediately to resolve something. How often does that happen? That is a resounding rejection.

Everyone is just sick if her bullshit it seems. Except her constituents, they love that shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

In another thread, someone referred to her as Perjury Traitor Greed, and I’m just here to make that more popular.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

My favorite is Marjorie Trailer Queen

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Mine was Margerine Trailer Grease.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

She’s no queen. Jester maybe. Clown for sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Weren’t court jesters known for their wit? She’d definitely overstep and end in the dungeons, in that scenario.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I guess on balance it’s more important to me that the Democrats reject Greene than reject Johnson. It’s clear to everyone that Johnson is “weak” (in MAGA support) and dependent completely on Democrats to get anything done.

Now that that’s out in the open and he’s slightly a MAGA pariah, he’ll probably get back to more old fashioned Republican projects like destroying the environment, fucking over workers, giving billions to billionaires, and a blank check to the military.

I mean … Freedom.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

He feels like a paul ryan type. He marks all the check boxes that the far right extremists need to have checked but in reality he’s just some chump with shitty beliefs and won’t ever be anything more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Just a reminder to Mikey that his fate is controlled by Democrats

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 427K

    Comments