In a Truth Social post, Trump attacked Biden − and Hamas − by accusing the president of “taking the side of these terrorists, just like he has sided with the Radical Mobs taking over our college campuses.”

84 points

Trump and Congressional Republicans sat on foreign aid for six months and now they have the balls to criticize

permalink
report
reply
44 points
*

They didn’t just sit. On multiple occasions they attempted to draft legislation to provide Israel with aid independent of Ukraine and Taiwan. Biden said he’d veto any attempts to pass a standalone Israel aid bill in February, and yet they tried again after the Iran retaliation.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/feb/05/joe-biden-veto-republican-standalone-israel-aid-bill

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Actually, they demanded that all foreign aid was wrapped into one package and border security be added. So, there was a long negotiation on border security. The Senate got through that, passed it and sent it to the House. Trump then told the House Republicans that he wanted to use border security as a campaign issue. So Johnson sat on it another three months, created his own bill without border security, and passed it. The Senate followed, and put it on Biden’s desk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yes you’re both correct. It was during that three month period (late January to April) after the version with border security got killed by Trump’s meddling, where Republicans were trying to push a stand alone Israel aid bill without Ukraine aid, and Biden issued his veto threat to any standalone Israel aid bill. The article the person you’re replying to linked was in February, after the border security version one with everything together had failed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This election couldn’t come sooner.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This is literally their job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That is literally not doing their job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Exactly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

This is what abstaining from voting will invite for protesters and Palestinians.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

We tried to tell them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*

Future tense. We should continue to try. I won’t judge someone who votes for Trump with conviction. The voter disenfranchisement manipulation on Lemmy is what needs to be challenged. It’s an unethical disengagement strategy, historically used by Republicans to disenfranchise Democratic voters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I would legitimately be interested to hear what convictions a trump voter had that were real, actual, policy positions.

They’re just generic sales slogans and whatever gaffes he makes that the crowd applauds loudest for. Not actual considered positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Lemmy didn’t cause this:

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

BuT bOtH SIdEs, cAnT YoU sEe I’m e n L I g H t E N e D?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Been telling them this for a long time now. Can’t get past their outrage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Good. that’s the message we need to go back and forth here to get uneducated voters away from voting trump because “Biden genocide”. Trump will be worse.

permalink
report
reply
-15 points
*

*Trump is worse for everyone that’s not a straight rich white Christian industrialist male with a subterranean bunker.

He’s legitimately good for those guys.

Edit: Whoosh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Depends. How do you like your government officials? Competent? Or no?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Who do you believe to be more competent? The guy who rambles on until the media cuts him off and farts himself awake during trial daily, or the guy that’s four years older than him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The bOtH siDeS crew must be losing their minds

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Recently, I was arguing with one, and they unironically suggested we’d be in a better position now if Trump had won in 2020.

Which is to say, I think you need to have one first in order to lose it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Oh, the Nazis are angry that a genocide is being paused? What a shocker!

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

Until very recently, centrist Democrats were calling anyone who suggested withholding weapons russian chinese child shill bot tankie fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I think you mean Republicans. Current polls show 58% of them are still in support of Israel.

https://zeteo.com/p/gaza-israel-genocide-poll-ceasefire-us-voters

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

I know what I meant, and so do you. Of course Republicans are dogshit.

But I’m not gonna pretend that centrists weren’t screaming abuse at people who opposed genocide until three days ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Oh no,the Democrats used a mean name you didn’t like.

Please show us on the doll where that hurt you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Oh no, Biden stopped sending bombs for genocide. I’m sorry that you can’t always get 100% of everything you want, but you should vote blue no matter who anyway. Unless you want Trump to win.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 331K

    Comments