I used this for years, from version 1.9 all the way to 5.x when I moved onto other software.

EDIT: Here is the full press release.

Press Release- Inside information May 16, 2024 – 08:30 CEST Winamp has announced that it is opening up its source code to enable collaborative development of its legendary player for Windows. Winamp has announced that on 24 September 2024, the application’s source code will be open to developers worldwide. Winamp will open up its code for the player used on Windows, enabling the entire community to participate in its development. This is an invitation to global collaboration, where developers worldwide can contribute their expertise, ideas, and passion to help this iconic software evolve. Winamp has become much more than just a music player. It embodies a unique digital culture, aesthetic, and user experience. With this initiative to open the source code, Winamp is taking the next step in its history, allowing its users to contribute directly to improving the product. “This is a decision that will delight millions of users around the world. Our focus will be on new mobile players and other platforms. We will be releasing a new mobile player at the beginning of July. Still, we don’t want to forget the tens of millions of users who use the software on Windows and will benefit from thousands of developers’ experience and creativity. Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version,” explains Alexandre Saboundjian, CEO of Winamp. Interested developers can now make themselves known at the following address: about.winamp.com/free-llama

82 points

The release doesn’t say it’s going FOSS. It doesn’t specify, but it hints that it’ll be “Source Available”. Stuff like:

Winamp will remain the owner of the software and will decide on the innovations made in the official version.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Could mean FOSS but they keep the trademark.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Sure, but that’s unlikely, given the wording. “Owner of the software” is fairly clear and trademark and software are very different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The open-source licenses that I’ve used don’t require surrendering copyright.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You can keep the trademark with FOSS. That’s why Debian had Iceweasel rather than Firefox.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yep, the press release says opening the source code. It also says they’re inviting developers to contribute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It also doesn’t include any wording that would indicate it’s FOSS. It doesn’t say anything about being able to fork, instead using phrases like, “participate in its development”, “allowing its users to contribute directly to improving the product”, and “will benefit from thousands of developers’ experience and creativity”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

When they say “inviting the developers to contribute”, it sounds to me that they are looking for developers to work on Winamp without having to pay them. The article is filled with strange wordings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Notice they avoid using the exact term “open source” in this press release. I’m ~90% sure it’ll turn out to be under some proprietary source-available license.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I had the same though. No way they would choose that wording otherwise. they will probably just make it available, also make people who contribute sign their copyright away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

They’ve already talked about adding NFTs to it. Winamp is dead and this is it’s corpse being paraded around like Weekend at Bernie’s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I stopped paying any attention to them when they started talking about NFTs. This is cool news.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Winamp still whips the Llamas ass.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Came here just to say something similar.

“Going FOSS really whips the llamas ass!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Not sure if you’re able to edit the title, but this doesn’t look like FOSS, just open source.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

doesn’t look like FOSS, just open source.

Open-source software is FOSS by definition. Did you mean source-available?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

If you ask the FSF, open source is a bigger set than free software, mostly to do with restrictions on the uses of the code

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html.en

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

And FOSS is an umbrella term encompassing both Free software and Open-Source software.

I’m glad to see people taking interest in the meanings behind these terms. We all benefit from understanding them better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

god i hate words

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Did you mean source-available?

I guess? Always thought there was some pedantic Stallman-esque argument for the differentiation between FOSS and OSS, independent of the Open Source vs Source Available distinction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Corrected. 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

There is nothing here saying it will be FOSS or open-source, just source-available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“This invites developers worldwide to contribute”

permalink
report
parent
reply

Free and Open Source Software

!foss@beehaw.org

Create post

If it’s free and open source and it’s also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 772

    Monthly active users

  • 901

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments