-16 points
*

According to the article, his lawyer states he was just essentially the landlord where a custodial dispute happened. So it sounds like something adjacent to the crime, such as lying to one of the parents about having seen the kid or something. Honestly, my parents got in custodial disputes, and I’ve even had one myself - I was so distraught over it that my emotions almost landed me in a similar situation. Luckily everything resolved itself (my wife thought I was having an affair due to her “friend” trying to convince her of such), but custodial disputes are not anywhere near ‘child sex trafficking’ levels of evil here…

It’s also not surprising at all that none of the comments thus far have shown any level of critical thought about the article either…

permalink
report
reply
18 points

You really stretched that one line into an entire hypothetical defense for a guy, while there’s literally zero evidence of any of that presented in the article.

Bad troll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Did you miss this line?

“Mr. Marta had nothing to do with custodial kidnapping,” Scott Rosenblum told the outlet. “He was essentially a landlord.”

With only that to go on…there’s some level of guessing at what that even means. You can only try and figure it out on hypothetical application.

These places are DYING to put the words “Qanon”, “sex trafficking”, “sound of freedom” into an article for SEO purposes. You should start being critical of your sources rather than just taking things for face value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Sir, I am from reddit - It’s bold of you to assume i read the article

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I wasn’t gonna read the article either tbh; but I embarrassed myself by spouting untrue information based off of the title of an article and being corrected publicly a few months ago so I’m trying to be better about making sure the information I “know” is correct.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

This! Read the article, guys! I hate QAnon as much as the rest but this guy was a “essentially a landlord” in a custody battle and, unless new facts come to light, it appears his part isn’t nearly as heinous as this clickbait title wants you to believe!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It makes me sad yo see this down voted with so little actual engagement with the content. Come on, Lemmy, you’re better than that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve learned that they really aren’t. I have seen this everywhere all week. All of the extremists of reddit seem to be the ones who hopped over, and they’re just as bad as qtards. Everyone is a troll, everyone is a bad faith actor to them, etc. Pretty much decided at this point that it’s just not worth attempting to engage with people online at all any more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well we are on the internet you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
5 points

This comment should not be down voted. Even if you or I disagree with the person’s politics. This should be the default in any court. I didn’t read the article at first either just the comments. When I did read it, it seems very much click bait. They buried the lawyer’s quote way down in the middle of the article and only one line. No follow up on the actual situation and harped some more on Qanon. I personally despise people who continue Qanon conspiracies, but the rest of us have to be better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Since I’m not on the jury, I’m not obligated to follow this idea

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

So I take it you don’t think OJ Simpson killed his ex-wife and her boyfriend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Q-anon adjacent film

lol

Where’s the word count for how many times Qanon is mentioned in this conspiracy theory laced film?

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Probably more to do with this guy being a QAnon nut.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Q-anon adjacent film

adjacent

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points
*

I haven’t seen the film or heard much about it, only seen a preview before gaurdians but

How is this film QAnon-adjacent?

(and how is it that anti-pedophilia is now only a right wing thing when the church has been fucking children for decades? dont let em have it…)

permalink
report
reply
1 point

It’s not. The media keeps wanting to make it so. There’s nothing Qanon about it. Jim Caviezel is a proponent of Qanon conspiracies, and that’s its only connection.

I know she can be “controversial” here, but Shoe0nHead did a video on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

This whole anti pedophilia thing coming from the right is just projection. They assume everyone else is one because they are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-103 points

So is your take that child trafficking isn’t a thing or it’s just not something that should be worried about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

They’re saying the right need to leave trans people and drag queens alone because they’re far from the problem when it comes to pedophilia and trafficking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

Being purposely obtuse is exhausting, makes you look like an idiot, doesn’t help make your point, and isn’t nearly as effective here as it is on all the other platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It’s that the right are the ones fucking kids, but you know that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Being anti-peaodophelia is a good thing. However, accusing other people of doing the things you’re doing is a bad thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

“You know how I know you’re gay? Only a gay dude would assume that everyone else is naturally gay.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you think being gay is a choice because you chose not to be gay, i have news for you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Well you see, its not. The left just wants it to be, so they say that it is anyways. Its called lying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

A lot of the cast and crew and people who endorsed the movie are very into the whole Qanon thing, including Tim Ballard, the real guy the movie is about. The movie itself doesn’t actually promote any of that, though, (or at least, not that I could tell) and a good chunk is based on a real sting operation. There’s a lot of fiction, as is the case with most ‘based on a true story’ movies, though. And I haven’t checked, but I’m kind of suspicious of the charity they encourage you to donate to during the credits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

Every right wing accusation is a confession

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 526K

    Comments