52 points
*

Ya know what, I think I am ok with punishing people leading war crime efforts. I sure do wonder what the party of “tough on crime” thinks about the ongoing genocide?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

They’re coveres by one of the commandments of their lord and saviour:

“Rules for thee, but not for me” — Supply Side Jesus

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I wonder what mister crime bill, lock the S.O.B up, thinks of it… Oh wait I don’t have to wonder he just told us!

In 1989 […] Mr. Biden lamented that the Republican president, George H. W. Bush, was not doing enough to put “violent thugs” in prison. In 1993, he warned of “predators on our streets.” And in a 1994 Senate floor speech, he likened himself to another Republican president: “Every time Richard Nixon, when he was running in 1972, would say, ‘Law and order,’ the Democratic match or response was, ‘Law and order with justice’ — whatever that meant. And I would say, ‘Lock the S.O.B.s up.’”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I really hope we eventually get to a government that unanimously agrees that all life has value.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They do, it’s a monetary value. 200,000 dead Palestinians = Lockheed Martin line go up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Maybe you should STOP AIDING THEM IN COMMITTING WAR CRIMES THEN???

permalink
report
reply
8 points

They don’t mean in terms of aid.

The US has refused to submit themselves or their soldiers to international criminal law for a long time now, for plenty of other reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Well to be fair, our government has done some war crimes. Maybe we should hear the ICC out on this one.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members'_Protection_Act

Because your government has laws that would shield its citizens from ICC persecutions. Because you know, your government feels above international humanitarian law.

When those arrest warrants are against your rivals (Putin) it is all fine and commendable, but when it is against you and your allies it is a despicable act. You see the double standards here?

War crimes are war crimes no matter the side that commits them. And trying to undermine international laws and institutions created with the whole idea to prevent humanity from making the same mistakes like in the past should be preserved and protected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes but also no. The U.S. isn’t a party to the ICC. It’s not under ICC jurisdiction regardless of the ASMPA. The function of the ASMPA is mostly to serve as political theater.

The U.S. should be a party to the ICC, but it’s not and it likely never will be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points
*

So basically the US government is a gigantic Trump - rising up in self-righteous fury at the very idea that anyone might dare to charge them for the crimes they’ve brazenly committed.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
27 points

permalink
report
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 126K

    Comments