219 points

See your problem is you’re editing the code until it passes the tests. It’s way easier if you edit the tests until it passes the code.

permalink
report
reply
110 points

This is what they mean by test driven development.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

castle.gif

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Can’t tell if you are joking. I know a lot of junior developers who think this is a legitimate solution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Unless you are using groovy (jenkins), then you are running the pipeline to find syntax errors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This comment is triggering and it should have a NSFW spoiler.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hate groovy, gradle and Jenkins!

I don’t know if sth. Else is better but I can confirm that shit is horrific

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

FYI, Jenkins has an endpoint to validate the pipeline without running it, and there’s a VSCode extension to do this without leaving the editor: https://www.jenkins.io/blog/2018/11/07/Validate-Jenkinsfile/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I am not using Jenkins anymore but this seems like a lifesaver, thanks for sharing

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Only for declarative pipelines, forget it if you use scripted ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I just replace all my tests with noop codes. Quick, easy, passes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If true == true pass!

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

permalink
report
reply
37 points

You just need to learn from big automakers and use Volkswagen!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Sir, you just made my day thank you!

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

DevOps is bad because for some reason we’ve decided to invent new programming languages that you can’t debug locally and so you have to keep pushing commits to the pipeline server. It’s bullshit.

“Why do you write all your pipelines as shell scripts and then wrap them in yaml at the very end”?

Because then I can run them locally quickly and test individual components of them instead of “edit, commit, push, wait 10 minutes, read error message, repeat”.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

FWIW, gitlab-runner exec and earthly exist for running tests locally, with others things like nektos/act for GHA as a 3rd party solution. I’ll never get used to yaml, though, all my pipelines are mostly shell scripts. Using a markup language as a programming language was definitely one of the decisions of all time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Gitlab-runner exec and act are great tools, but this goes out of the window as soon as the cloud hosting service is a little less intelligent (looking at you, azure DevOps, who removed the hack that let pipeline run locally in 2019)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s why earthly exists. Now you can run your pipeline on a container with a “familiar syntax” inside another container with a “familiar syntax” inside of a “reproducible, easy-to-use” VM provisioned on top of probably KVM, as Torvalds intended

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

How are you bad?

You got a green verification checkmark on the same day! That’s a win!

permalink
report
reply
1 point

My build environment has 3 jillion unneeded builds going. I am lucky to get 2 build failures in a single day.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 3.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 35K

    Comments