-41 points

Cool. There are a lot of people in the UK that have no interest in doing anything for the UK. Will be good to make people more British.

There some long running families that contribute to defence, police or firefighting. Then there are others that have never contributed and just take.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Obvious troll is obvious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Everyone contributes to society by paying tax. Ordering people to do a specific job is not cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Not everyone contributes tax and not everyone contributes more than they get out. In fact most don’t. There is more to society than just tax and people don’t contribute to the UK.

Also it isn’t about making people do a specific job. It’s in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Have you ever bought luxury goods such as most food or clothes? Well then, you paid VAT. I’d love to hear what stats you’re pulling out of your arse that say otherwise!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The best argument against national service?

The armed forces, whom it would affect, absolutely hate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Its about the country though not just the armed forced. Also isn’t not just armed forces, you can read it in the article.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Swap “armed forces” with “fire service”, “NHS” or “the police”, and the point is exactly the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

A bit rude to talk about the royals like that when the Queen has just died.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The Royal family do a lot more for the country, more than a lot of people.

But yea they get away with not doing a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I contribute plenty. I volunteer for several charities including AgeUK and a local food bank and I give blood.

Want to make it mandatory? piss off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

Good for you.

A lot of people aren’t like you and I think the government should be doing more to get more out of the people. Things like happiness and wellbeing and safety is correlated with community and helping others.

Lots of this country has really gone to shit and could do with going to back to some of the ways in the past life was different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wasn’t it a lovely WW2?!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Would you be up for being compelled to give up a day a month to do good works? Not volunteering, mind, compelled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’d rather my kids were taught to benefit the whole of humanity rather than be trained as a tool for one political parties ideologies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

Good job they have the option then as mentioned in the article that we are talking about. It’s almost like you agree with me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Unfortunately most people only see the military side of it (as per most of the comments on here), but it’s only one of the options. Getting people involved isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I wouldn’t mind spending a weekend a month doing cyber defence or learning about logistics, but at 67 am probably a bit old for that. Although I have just completed a 3 month cyber security course ;-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Conservative Party has said it would bring back mandatory national service if it wins the general election.It said 18-year-olds would have a choice of either joining the military full-time, or volunteering one weekend every month carrying out a community service.The party is proposing a Royal Commission to consider the details but would plan for the first teenagers to take part in September 2025.The cost is expected to be around £2.5bn per year.Under the plans, young people could choose a full-time, 12-month placement in the armed forces or UK cyber defence, learning about logistics, cyber security, procurement or civil response operations.Their other option would be to volunteer one weekend per month - or 25 days per year - in their community with organisations such as fire, police and the NHS.Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said he believed bringing back compulsory service across the UK would help foster the “national spirit” that emerged during the pandemic.Mr Sunak said: “This is a great country but generations of young people have not had the opportunities or experience they deserve and there are forces trying to divide our society in this increasingly uncertain world.“I have a clear plan to address this and secure our future.

I will bring in a new model of National Service to create a shared sense of purpose among our young people and a renewed sense of pride in our country.

"The prime minister said the move would help young people to learn “real world skills, do new things and contribute to their community and our country”.

A Labour Party spokesperson called the announcement “another desperate £2.5 billion unfunded commitment from a Tory Party which already crashed the economy, sending mortgages rocketing, and now they’re spoiling for more.“This is not a plan – it’s a review which could cost billions and is only needed because the Tories hollowed out the armed forces to their smallest size since Napoleon,” the spokesperson said.Liberal Democrat defence spokesperson Richard Foord MP accused the Tories of cutting troop numbers.Mr Foord said: "If the Conservatives were serious about defence, they would reverse their damaging cuts to our world class professional armed forces, instead of decimating them, with swingeing cuts to the number of our regular service personnel.

This Conservative government has cut troop numbers and is planning more cuts to the size of the Army.In the UK, National Service - the country’s old name for conscription - ended in 1960.The Conservatives said the move would help ensure young people who are unemployed or not in education or training, and those disproportionately represented in the criminal justice system, are diverted away from “lives of unemployment and crime”.The party said national service would provide “valuable work experience” and “ignite a passion for a future career in healthcare, public service, charity or the armed forces”.A number of European countries, including Sweden, Norway and Denmark, already have a form of conscription for their armed forces.Conscription requires young men and women to serve for a limited time in uniform.

It means that some of the population will have had some military training - and can then be assigned to reserve units should war break out.Cuts in the British Army have seen its size fall from more than 100,000 in 2010 to around 73,000 as of January 2024.


The original article contains 553 words, the summary contains 545 words. Saved 1%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
85 points

I’m far too old to be subject to this, but I cannot emphasise how strongly the government could fuck right off if they wanted to draft me.

For one thing, the government doesn’t own us. We’re not things to be deployed as they see fit. We own them. We pay for them, and their jobs come and go at our discretion.

For another, fuck all the way off with this “national spirit” shit. You know how you build national spirit? Build a nation that people are actually proud of and want to live in. If we had any solidarity amongst ourselves during the pandemic, it was because we had to band together to get through the crisis because the government was doing fuck all to help. Or was actively endangering people to generate money for business with things like Eat Out To Help Out, which was spearheaded by… Rishi Sunak.

Thirdly, fuck off even further with volunteering with the Police, Fire and NHS. AKA the services that we pay for with our fucking taxes that they’re supposed to administrate, but instead apparently the plan is to piss all the money away on nothing, make us still pay for it, and then force us to work for them for free to keep them fucking running.

Fuck. Right. Off. I will go to prison before I participate in this fucking nonsense.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I agree all the way around.

A military recruiter (I don’t remember which branch) spent most of one summer in the 80s trying to phone me while I was home from university. The first time, I was out but my mom told him I wasn’t interested. The second time, she told him – truthfully – that I was busy and couldn’t take his call but that I also wasn’t interested. The third time, she suggested that I tell him myself so that he could stop wasting everyone’s time. That conversation started something like “Hello, I mean no disrespect, but you don’t want me in your organization. I speak Russian for a reason.” He agreed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

For one thing, the government doesn’t own us. We’re not things to be deployed as they see fit. We own them. We pay for them, and their jobs come and go at our discretion.

They don’t see it that way any more.

As someone who has been through military training and national service, I do think that everyone could benefit from it, but I’m strongly opposed to making adults do things they don’t want to do. The government isn’t mommy and daddy, and adults are not children, beholden to an authority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m strongly opposed to controlling minors too. 18 is an arbitrary age to suddenly give people autonomy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

May I respectfully ask if you have children? If not, I dare say your opinion on this might change when you hear the hare brained schemes your kids come up with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Children are emotional creatures without fully developed brains. They cannot process the long term ramifications of their actions because that part of their brain literally hasn’t finished developing yet. Sometimes you need to make children do things. If they won’t put the bleach bottle down that they pulled out from under the sink, you need to make them do it, no matter how badly they want to drink the bleach.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I feel like if we want national service just make it part of scouts… in fact the UK already has a scout summer camp thing thats basically kiddies first army training. Its just rather expensive. If instead we made it free and maybe even incentivized (Army scouts = summer camp + your first part time job?) it’d firstly be voluntary and secondly we’d have a way better recruiting pool for the actual army when people get older. The lack of commitment would also mean people maybe not interested in the army but curious can give it a try and at the very least the people who went would come back moderately fitter and able to serve in a militia in the unlikely event the UK mainland is ever invaded.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The USA has a program between the Army and the Boy Scouts of America, or whatever they’re calling themselves these days. When I was younger you could enlist into the Army at the rank of E3 if you obtained Eagle Scout in the Boy Scouts. That’s the equivalent of a couple years worth of non-war-time promotions, so that was a pretty cool benefit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Mate I think you would like the badge I have on my leather jacket which has the union flag with the caption “FUCK ME LIKE THE GOVERNMENT” across it.

Now I wonder how many grandparents out there are looking at their grandkids and thinking “these little fuckers need a bit of WAR” because that’s the only people that want this.

Fuck this jug-eared midget, I hope he gets cancer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

FUCK ME LIKE THE GOVERNMENT

Lmaooo

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

From a little shop in Afflecks Palace in Manchester if anyone else wants one

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

plan is to piss all the money away on nothing

They don’t piss it away on nothing – they pay friends, family and assorted neoliberals huge sums of money to piss it away on nothing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I remember when Carter tried to reactivate the US military draft. It didn’t go well. Young people hated it. Their parents hated it. Their grandparents hated it. Businesses hated it. Colleges hated it. The military hated it. Only Jimmy Carter seemed to love it.

Reagan won the next election in a landslide.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Ha. I ain’t fighting for this shit hole, unless we getting invaded and even then I see if the invader might be better than what we got now.

permalink
report
reply

UK Politics

!uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create post

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments