-3 points

I started smoking as a teenager after those warnings were put on cigarettes. I did it despite knowing it was addictive and it was bad for me.

Kids don’t give a shit. They think they’re immortal.

But sure, waste your time.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points

Same. How many teens currently vape? Wait, did they not know these substances are harmful?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Those warnings had a statistically significant effect on smoking rates. Just because it doesn’t work on everyone doesn’t mean it doesn’t work.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Please let me see these statistics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

https://academic.oup.com/her/article/34/3/321/5424102

In short, yes, but only before addiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The idea of a warning is not because anyone thinks you’re going to read it and get scared and stop doing the thing you’re hooked on.

The idea of a warning label is so your ice-age brain, the brain that loves to make up stories to explain things, has something to connect with when you start having a negative experience on something like social media, or something to help you realize that the thing, whatever it may be, is addictive and the reason you’re having problems is because of that addictive quality. We greatly overestimate our brains and our capacity to properly identify threats and tell ourselves the correct story to escape the threat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Can’t wait to have to sign in with your driver’s license to get on Facebook think of the children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Already true for porn sites in some states. The inevitable data leak will not be pretty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How Money Changes the Way You Think and Feel

Money is clearly harmful. Let’s put a warning label on every bill and coin: “Addictive”?

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

I don’t particularly feel like there needs to be a government campaign to get rid of Lemmy/kbin/mbin, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, etc.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Did you read the article?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why did you not understand it then?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I’m glad that the government is trying to address the issue of social media, but obviously adding warnings isn’t going to do anything.

I think the only way to actually solve the problem would be to regulate the recommendation algorithms to make them less addictive and less harmful.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

It seems like an awareness campaign is a good start. People on this platform are generally very social media savvy, but the harms of social media are far from common knowledge.

One of the most important things that Lemmy has done is to introduce a transparent ranking algorithm. It turns out that people do like algorithms in our social media, as long as we can see and control them. There’s nothing sinister about an algorithm when you can easily see what is getting boosted and why (and switch it off at will)

Other federated media are developing personalized algorithms that will be well suited to other platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I can’t tell if this dude is 23 years old or 53 years old.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Dall-E lookin’ ass

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Young face old hair

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments