But I agree with him. Cracker settler culture sucks.
I agree, there’s a certain parasitic, infectious culture. It has spread, through genocidal force, across the world; it has dominated the financial systems of the entire world for the past 500~ years. It has conducted “great replacements” of many indigenous peoples, and continues to seek to do so. All across the world, it seeks to undermine and destroy those who have done it no harm- to balkanize, destabilize, exploit, and demean other peoples, and profit off of their misery.
Of course, I’m talking about the culture/ideology of imperialism, derived from western barbarism…
I had never really considered until recently the absurdity of the term Judeo-Christian.
I don’t talk to religious folks in the West enough, is Abrahamic not more commonly used, since that covers Islam as well?
Not exclusively, it’s been used for a very long time to target socialists and indigenous people in the Americas as well, Bolivia, Argentina, and Chile’s dictatorships used it as a dog-whistle against their indigenous people, and perhaps even more so against their socialist movements.
During the cold war the “Judeo Christian” thing started to gain traction with reactionaries in the west as a way of distancing themselves from the “Judeo Bolsheviks” in the socialist bloc, how their values where better because they combined Judaism with Christianity, rather than Marxism, which was inherently meaningless because neither had anything to do with Judaism, and western liberalism has arguably little to do with Christian values either.
Setting aside this moron (whoever he is), the sentence:
Not all cultures are equal
…is not wrong without context in a general sense. I just wanted to put that out, there do exist bad cultures that should be eradicated, our social struggles have no point otherwise.
Yeah, in a vacuum the sentence isn’t necessarily horrible, but I’ve never heard anyone say that without an implication of “so we should eliminate the savages”
Thankfully, you guys don’t mean for “counter-revolutionaries” to get the wall, though!
“Counter-revolutionaries” that actively try to harm socialist projects? Sure. Far, far less than “dirty reds” and socialists (and beyond) killed in the hegemon and the third world to enforce the hegemony or protect private interests. Just ask Chiquita.
Do you have an example where there was some unjust mass execution or “persecution” related to a “counter-revolution” accusation? Perhaps, we can look more into it and the details surrounding it. That’s my favorite part!
Or are you talking about when a PatSoc gets cancelled on twitter.
Liberal scratched?
