9 points

Kinda looks like one of those turtle tanks (blyatmobiles) that are showing up now in the Russian-Ukrainian War.

permalink
report
reply
20 points

Does that thing have a big turntable under there somewhere? Because from the photo, it looks like it can shoot in exactly or almost exactly the direction the rails happen to be pointing, and if you need to shoot somewhere more than two or three degrees to either side, you’re SOL…

permalink
report
reply
9 points

We’re huntin trains today, Billy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m guessing it was used almost exclusively to destroy trains.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Siege of Petersburg, I believe, so trading fire between two relatively static lines.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

It doesn’t look like it. They did sometimes use a kind of turntable to allow regular cannons to easily change direction, but I don’t think the same was done with these.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Maybe it’s because of the recoil?

Having the canon alligned with the track allows it to move with the recoil while having it slightly angled may make it derail 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Id expect it was intended to be operated on a curved section of tracks to allow it to aim and function as artillery. Similar concept as the https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwerer_Gustav

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Back when a solid plank was all I took to protect you from rifle fire. Or does the encasing serve some other purpose, perhaps?

permalink
report
reply
24 points

It also serves as a bike ramp. The Confederate soldiers were well known for their love of BMX tricks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Plank stronk

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Wood still wasn’t strong enough to sustain a lot of fire even from those rifles. The confederacy just didn’t have enough iron.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s some pretty thick wood at a good angle. Maybe there’s a mythbusters, but I’d expect it could protect against small arms fire of the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wood is definitely better than nothing, but I don’t really see a situation in which this thing would need protection against small arms anyway. Unless something has already gone horribly wrong, those small arms are a significant distance from your artillery. At that range, they are already effectively worthless because their lack of rifling makes them horribly inaccurate.

If I had to guess, you would mainly be worried about union sharpshooters (maybe) and artillery. At that point the only real advantage of the wood is the obstruction of sight.

permalink
report
parent
reply

HistoryPorn

!historyporn@lemmy.world

Create post

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators’ instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

Community stats

  • 3.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 954

    Posts

  • 7.9K

    Comments