11 points

Might not be illegal but is certainly very telling about how seriously he takes being an MP.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Just hedging his chances, if he doesn’t win he wins his £8k bet, if he wins then his nose is in the trough at Westminster. It’s win/win for him (and lose/lose for the public)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A senior Conservative candidate reportedly placed an £8,000 bet on losing his seat at the general election.Sir Philip Davies neither confirmed nor denied the wager, first reported by the Sun, external but rejected suggestions he had done “anything illegal”.Sir Philip, who has been the Tory MP for Shipley since 2005, told the newspaper he expected to lose the seat on 4 July.

Sir Philip said it was “nobody’s business” whether he placed the bet or not.He said: "What’s it got to do with you whether I did or didn’t.

"He added: “And if anyone’s alleging I’ve done anything illegal, they’re very welcome to allege it, but I’m afraid I haven’t.”When contacted by the BBC, Sir Philip said he stood by his comments to the newspaper but did not offer any further comment.The Conservative party has also been approached by the BBC.

Live: Follow the latest news about the UK general electionPoll tracker: How do parties compare?Compare all the election manifestos and policiesWhat photo ID will you need to vote?General election 2024: All BBC stories and analysis

The report about Sir Philip came after several parliamentary candidates were accused of placing bets surrounding the date or outcome of the election.Earlier this week, the Conservative party withdrew support from Craig Williams, the candidate in Montgomeryshire and Glyndŵr, and Laura Saunders, the candidate in Bristol North West, who are both being investigated by the Gambling Commission.Russell George, a Conservative politician in the Welsh Parliament, is also facing inquiries by the regulator and has “stepped back” from his frontbench role.Meanwhile, Labour suspended Kevin Craig as its candidate for Central Suffolk and North Ipswich after learning he had placed a bet on losing his bid to become an MP.Follow BBC Yorkshire on Facebook, external, X (formerly Twitter), external and Instagram, external.

Independent - NagbeaReform UK - Simon DandyConservative - Philip DaviesLabour - Anna DixonThe Yorkshire Party - Will GrantWorkers Party of Britain - Waqas KhanChristian Peoples Alliance - Darryl Morton-WrightLiberal Democrat - Graham ReedSocial Democratic Party - Paul ShkurkaGreen - Kevin Warnes


The original article contains 395 words, the summary contains 333 words. Saved 16%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

See, I don’t care about this at all. There’s no suggestion he was going to deliberately throw the election. He didn’t have any inside information. He’s allowed to place bets!

permalink
report
reply
43 points

It seems to me a given that you shouldn’t be able to place bets on outcomes you can directly influence. This is not so different from e.g. a boxer betting on himself to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Also… Just give £8000 to charity ffs

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

There is no indication that any of the politicians who bet against themselves intended to throw the election. Politics is not sport.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The possibility of throwing is what makes it a bad look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sweet summer child…

permalink
report
parent
reply

UK Politics

!uk_politics@feddit.uk

Create post

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don’t post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments