24 points

A good one IMHO is Omnivore.

Omnivore is a complete, open source read-it-later solution for people who love to read.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

Strange how it isnโ€™t on f-droidโ€ฆ Iโ€™ve come to expect all open-source apps to be on there, probably naively.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Itโ€™s my first time seeing an OSS app that doesnโ€™t at least have an own F-Droid repo, if it isnโ€™t already in the official F-Droid repo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Thanks for this. I donโ€™t usually dive into longer format article stuff because I find it on my phone and reading on my phone sucks. I tried pocket, but it didnโ€™t function at all on my reader.

This solves that problem reasonably well.

(Edit: also an RSS reader? Maybe I should start using RSS again. I do wish it offered paged navigation controls to better work on an ereader, but itโ€™s definitely an improvement still.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

No, Iโ€™ve never really understood the point. I have bookmarks in my browser if I want to save something for later. I donโ€™t really need anything more fancy than that.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I donโ€™t use pocket any more but I tried it out. I think the benefit was that you had the sync of articles to read between all devices with pocket.

Personally, I use a browser for specific sites or searches. I use apps like Lemmy (connect) for content discovery pocket is a bridge between the two. It also allowed sharing between peopke. So rather than sharing a link by email or WhatsApp, Iโ€™d just add it to their pocket.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I use Inoreader to read RSS feeds of my favorite sources, and I save interesting articles to Pocket. I use the tagging feature and sync my Pocket entries to an Obsidian vault using an extension. It creates a web of information I found valuable enough to save, connected by tag. It helps me see trends and topics Iโ€™m interested in emerge over time

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Came here to say the exact same thing. People really do love to reinvent browser bookmarks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I think most people these days donโ€™t use browser bookmarks as a โ€œcheck this out laterโ€ tool, and instead as more of a โ€œI frequently need to access this pageโ€ function. For me, I only bookmark a page if itโ€™s something I frequently access; things like my email, Lemmy, some work apps, etc. In my use-case, bookmarks are a more โ€œpermanentโ€ installation to my browser.

Also, โ€œread laterโ€ apps generally strip the web page formatting and advertisements, and usually have an offline function of some sort; both of which you typically canโ€™t do with bookmarks. These are especially useful for those who like to read on their commute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think most people these days donโ€™t use browser bookmarks as a โ€œcheck this out laterโ€ tool, and instead as more of a โ€œI frequently need to access this pageโ€ function.

So whatโ€™s preventing those people from using bookmarks as โ€œcheck this out laterโ€ tool? The personal preference of using an app that reinvented those same bookmarks? Just create a โ€œread-it-laterโ€ later directory and boom, youโ€™re good to go.

Also, โ€œread laterโ€ apps generally strip the web page formatting and advertisements, and usually have an offline function of some sort; both of which you typically canโ€™t do with bookmarks.

Yeah, because these are features typically provided by your browser. Hence, browser bookmarks. Itโ€™s not a unique feature to read-it-later apps in any way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The general difference is that these bookmarks go away when re-opened. Theyโ€™re an alternative to leaving a buttload of tabs open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

https://fortelabs.co/blog/the-secret-power-of-read-it-later-apps

So this article was included with Omnivore, which is suggested elsewhere in this thread, but it does provide a bunch of well structured arguments for the utility of a dedicated app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just speed. Share an article to pocket and its savedโ€ฆ

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I use Wallabag in the sense that I save articles to it, but I only really read them when I donโ€™t have service or on my e-reader

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I subscribed to wallabag, but there are so many rough edges I gave up on it after six months. Terrible experience ๐Ÿ˜•

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I use omnivore for longer articles and highlighting parts of the text. It also have a plugin to sync with obsidian. Itโ€™s really good, but I imagine self-hosting it can be tricky.

For a link-dump, I use Shiori. Could be anything vaguely interesting but I want to take a look later - works wonders for that.

And I have been a former pocket user, wallabagโ€ฆ But I stick with omnivore and Shiori.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Nope. Just a bunch of tabs and bookmarks, donโ€™t need anything else.

permalink
report
reply

Asklemmy

!asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Create post

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, itโ€™s welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.1K

    Posts

  • 279K

    Comments