28 points

While there’s a lot of fine print reasons, I’d imagine it all goes back to 1 thing. Bigotry.

permalink
report
reply
-21 points
*

I believe it’s cos LGBTQ+ people are a minor biological abnormality… I mean, common sense tell me LGBTQ+ people are like 10% of population so they will obviously be less homeowners.

permalink
report
reply
-11 points

Woh now that’s logical thinking we can’t have logic, we must be up in arms over this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

In b4 delete chain…can’t have logic on Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

bad title, the actual article is talking about the percentage of each that own homes, not expecting half of all homes to be owned by LGBTQ people

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The article makes it clear that it’s proportional, not absolute.

But what do I know, I’m just a “minority biological abnormality” apparently

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

paragraph 4 in the article states how they corrected for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

RTFA. They accounted for that. This is about rates of homeownership.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s actually lower than 10%. I had always commonly heard 10% and was shocked to learn that it’s more like 4.5%.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/259571/americans-greatly-overestimate-gay-population.aspx

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

TBH IDK why there is so much woke hype about LGBTQ+ here on lemmy, trans here trans there… I believe it’s more like some kind of propaganda to get votes from young people.

People here give too much importance for 4.5% of the population.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Because that 4.5% of the population is deserving of the same human rights as anyone else, and when they are denied those rights, they are more susceptible to abuse and suicide.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_among_LGBT_youth

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Also, define “woke hype”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

It’s like 40% in those under 18 because of social pressures from the LGBTQ community. And less than 1% in those over like…50 or something…

It’s because they’re represented far greater than is proportional for their community.

Like, you’ll never see a dark black person on TV, or almost any Asian people. But guaranteed there will be a VERY light skinned black person, and someone who’s gay at the very least. Almost never any hispanic people in our television either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Just wanted to inform you that your vocabulary is flawed. Homosexuality is a minority, not an abnormality. Homosexuality is completely normal among pretty most intelligent mammals on this planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

You don’t get an inheritance if your family abandoned you….

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Uhh… Am I the only one who says “because LGBTQ persons make up like 10% of the population?” I’m pretty sure the headline left out a “proportionally” somewhere but… Hmmm.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

the headline did, but the actual article does not

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Agreed. The real problem is affordability. Most people are already priced out and it continues to get worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’d be interested if they took samples of home ownership across LGBTQ+ and cis populations in geographies with high acceptance of LGBTQ+ populations. Do we see parity in this case? Could it be that geographies that contain accepting societies all have low home ownership?

As in, could places where higher home ownership exist not overlap with LGBTQ+ acceptance?

permalink
report
reply
0 points

Give me one example of an “accepting society”

Gay marriage may be legal, but nowhere in this world exists true equality. So what I’m saying is, it’d be impossible to reliably gather research comparing more accepting and less accepting places, because the overwhelmingly conservative climate still exists regardless of minor differences in public sentiment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I imagine a gay couple living in the Castro District in San Fransisco experiences a different level acceptance than if that same couple were living in Birmingham Alabama.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Different, yeah.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 315K

    Comments