time for big bang revision

6 points

‘Forbidden’ black holes? What wrote this headline?

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

space.com usual clickbait. half expected them to talk about hungry black holes. not too bad of an article

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

is this the starting point of a new cosmology ?
https://lemmy.world/post/17053001

(physicists) …these luminous objects do not quite fit comfortably into those theories. …

Those objects fit comfortably in reality but those theories (Big Bang, LCDM…) do not.

source // open access :
RUBIES: Evolved Stellar Populations with Extended Formation Histories at z ∼ 7–8 in Candidate Massive Galaxies Identified with JWST/NIRSpec https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7

permalink
report
reply
2 points

seem to need some revision. that’s what I like about science. observations revise theories. no unchangable beliefs.

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1K

    Posts

  • 11K

    Comments