Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has set his sights on eliminating the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday announced which cases it would consider next and which it wouldn’t. Among those the court rejected was a case that challenged the authority of OSHA, which sets and enforces standards for health and safety in the workplace.

And Thomas, widely considered to be the most conservative justice on the already mostly conservative court, wasn’t happy.

In a dissent, he explained why he believed the high court should’ve taken the case: OSHA’s power, he argues, is unconstitutional.

301 points

Clarence Thomas is unconstitutional. By his own originalist logic, he is only 3/5 of a human and should not be married to a white woman.

Fuck Clarence Thomas.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

He is a straight up real life Clayton Bigsby

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
181 points
*

Is Clarence Thomas okay, like upstairs? Does he just go around pointing at random things and screaming “Unconstitutional!” ? Is “unconstitutional” in the room with us right now?

Artist’s Rendition:

permalink
report
reply
66 points

Fanart of artist rendition:

I have the sound of this stuck in my head now, thanks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Last year, WNYC had an episode of their More Perfect podcast all about Thomas and, more or less, how he got that way.

https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolabmoreperfect/episodes/clarence-x

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

His donors point and he attacks

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

If you want an in-depth profile on how Thomas’ political views are shaped, check out the PBS Frontline documentary on him.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=wJuRx1wARUk&si=TCeumVNzVZICsNg7

permalink
report
parent
reply
117 points

“The agency claims authority to regulate everything from a power lawnmower’s design,” he wrote, “to the level of ‘contact between trainers and whales at SeaWorld.’”

I fail to see anything wrong with either thing like… is he just mad it is not the people who sell lawn mowers should decide what’s safe?? Please please please don’t tell me Americans are going to dip to this new level of cognitive dissonance

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Coming soon: the freedom to be maimed by corporations cutting corners on dangerous equipment design and safety equipment provision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Lawn darts are back on the menu boys

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I miss lawn darts, but the ban made sense. Holy hell, people were stupid with those things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s still illegal to resell them too. I see them pop up in reseller groups from time to time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not speaking to policy but law, he’s probably hinting that this is a violation of the non delegation doctrine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondelegation_doctrine

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

I assume soon we will be getting rid of the weekend and the 40-hour work week.

We’re already letting children work jobs that maim and kill them again.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Of course! That’s what family values are all about! Praise the lord and pass the ammunition!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Username checks out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
109 points

I wonder how much money his handlers paid for that position.

permalink
report
reply
78 points

They got him cheap, the man is a bargain whore… actually, I take that back, I wouldn’t want to insult prostitutes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Probably like 100k, which is pennies to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 392K

    Comments