Would installing an OS on an external ssd and booting into that to run pirated software while blocking access to other drives in your system or physically unplugging them be one way?

Or are there better ways to isolate the software you run and use as much as possible?

44 points

I don’t know where you guys get your stuff but if you have reasons to be this causious I would suggest having your important stuff somewhere else instead of the other way arround.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

It doesn’t hurt to be cautious. Trusted sources have occasionally included malicious materials and blindsided users

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Of course you have. Even with genuine, non-pirated software. Have you heard about data mining?

A(n outbound) firewall is an absolute minimum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Depends on your threat model.

A air gap system is the gold standard.

A virtual machine is a reasonable middle ground, and of course you cut the network access.

Qubes lets you do both but it sacrifices some performance.

A word of caution about dual booting systems: if something is running on the computer, it in theory has full access to everything attached to that computer, including unmounted drives, encrypted drives, even BIOS. There are Trojans that install themselves in the boot partition, and it’s possible an infected operating system could infect the non-infected operating system next time you boot.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Trojans that install themselves into the MBR will just screw up your boot process on a UEFI system and vice versa. Also, if you don’t use a default bootloader, you’ll definitely notice something on a UEFI system if it tries to delete all other bootloaders.

On BIOS systems however, it gets a little tricky, since it just blindly reads the first few sectors, without respect to what you “set” as the default, so that Trojan could just add itself and move everything over a bit, and you can’t tell. See the Michelangelo MBR virus. It wiped your drive on March 6 of any year.

On a UEFI system, the best it could do is replace the Microsoft bootloader, and that would trip Secure Boot, which is enabled by default. Even then you don’t need to directly modify sectors or format your drive, you can just replace the bootloader.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed it’s rare. But it exists, Moon bounce, Mosaic regressor, so if you’re trying to segment things you should just remove the drives and not worry about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Threat model is just trying to lower the chances of infecting the main drive even if stuff like games or software are from a “trusted source”.

Aside from getting an enitely separate system dedicated to just running pirated games which is expensive to do.

Unmounted drives in case of dual booting still leading to infections is what made me wonder about installing an OS entirely on the external SSD and physically unplugging other drives. Of course, as you said bios is still a risk. But, more just trying to lessen chances from trusted game sources by not installing right away from release to see if anything happens to other people the first couple of weeks. And just wishing to not intermingle the two environments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

If your computer has a TPM, and secure boot, you could reasonably swap out your data drives. So you have one drive for your untrusted programs and one drive for your trusted programs. Never put them in the computer at the same time together. And that would cover a lot of the risk surface.

If you have any connected peripherals that have data storage, like fancy monitors that have a boot drive attached, or programmable keyboards, or anything like that, those are potential vectors to cross contaminate. So don’t plug those into the system with the untrusted programs

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

A virtual machine would be relatively safe most of the time.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

How is the performance impact these days for games compared to running natively?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Not great but better than it used to be. Don’t do a GPU passthrough.

permalink
report
parent
reply

What’s wrong with GPU passthrough?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

How about sandboxie ?

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I would love to know the answer to that. It’s an interesting solution to be sure, but it surely has some kind of holes.

Also, it doesn’t work with electron apps. Found that out the hard way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

KVM would be a safe way to test your pirated software. But it downgrades the performance.

permalink
report
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.3K

    Posts

  • 86K

    Comments