The Labour party has won over 400 seats (out of 650) in the 2024 UK General Elections, and Keir Starmer is expected to replace Rishi Sunak as Prime Minister. The Conservatives, in power for the last fourteen years, have suffered a rout, losing over two-thirds of their seats. The SNP has collapsed in Scotland, mostly to Labour, and the Liberal Democrats have gained over sixty seats.

9 points

let me guess, they will do nothing and fascism will come back again…

permalink
report
reply
38 points
*

I get what a lot of you guys are saying about Starmer and the Labour government not being as left wing as Corbyn. I would also like someone who would use this majority to implement some really hardcore leftist policies.

But please can we just take a step back and look at what he wants to do:

  • Massive amounts of NHS funding

  • Nationalised green energy

  • Tax private schools

  • Allow regulators to hit company executives with criminal charges

  • Nationalise the railways

  • Increase the minimum wage to a living wage

  • Free school meals

I don’t know about you, but that seems at the very least, left of center. Sure, he’s not making drastic sweeping changes right off the bat. But this country needs an era of stability, whilst we make small but consistent steps in the right direction, and that’s what Starmer will give us

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Still let’s not forget the right-wing policies from their manifesto:

  • Increasing military spending by 13 billion

  • Increase police funding

  • More border security force to “stop the boats”

  • Build more prisons

  • Pour money into polluting industries (car gigafactories, steel production, “carbon capture”)

  • Keep oil and gas production in the North Sea for decades, with the only focus on jobs and none on environmental issues.

So yeah I guess it’s better to have an authoritarian social-ish democratic state than an outright fascist one but that’s not a very high bar and will only work until the climate crisis boils us all alive :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They’ll increase policing and call it a day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Starmer and the Labour government not being as left wing as Corbyn

It goes a lot farther than that. From the Cass Report to the HS2 to the genocidal approach towards migrant refugees (deliberate sinking of boats in the Mediterranean), Starmer’s Labour party has demonstrated very little interest in reversing Tory policy.

They campaigned as moderate administrators of Tory extremist platforms and they are positioning themselves to continue to looting of the UK with a liberal demeanor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If you would get to know just one, single thing about blairites, that one thing would be to know that regardless what they promise, they do austerity and neoliberalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

That’s a great wish list, but I’m not sure how many of those will happen. Increased NHS funding is sadly unlikely given your economy and xenophobia against immigrants. I’m hoping you get increased support for green energy, free school meals and rail nationalisation, and at least a modest raise in the minimum wage. Cheap, clean energy, educated and healthy children, and an affordable and reliable transport system can do so much for the economy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
128 points

Well, at least the was one election where Nazis didn’t win big.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

They didn’t do that bad really, it just wasn’t reflected in the results. A new further right party showed up and split the right wing vote, which is largely why Labour won. If you look at the total votes the righter win parties did pretty well (Tories are really all that right wing but they did get the right wing vote).

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Yeah, as much as I hate everything Farage stands for, fair play to him for splitting the Tory voters and delivering a Labour government. I just wish that kind of thing wasn’t necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

New party (Reform) skyrocketed in fact. Had the vote not been split, conservatives would have won many more seats. Next cycle will be… Interesting. Especially with Nigel Farage getting a seat (Trump-like, seeded discontent leading to Brexit, who’s never been elected before).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the UK had a preferential voting system the Tories would have won a lot more seats

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Mind describing to us what you consider a right, but not far right, political stance is? Examples of both economic and social policies would be welcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

For me I’d say the one-nation part of the conservative party.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/One-nation_conservatism

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Democrats. Sounds funny, but it’s true. Bernie would be “mostly left”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m not American so I’m not all that familiar with that frame of reference

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

An overwhelming majority by seats but only 33% of the popular vote.

36% voted Tory/Reform so voters have not shifted left but split the more right wing vote

permalink
report
reply
35 points
*

We already have the left wing vote split by Labour, Lib Dem and Green.

If you want to claim the 36%, you’ll need to add up the left wing parties together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Not left wing. Just left.

None of them are left wing (maybe Green has some left wing stuff?)

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

green is definately left wing, they’re hardly anti immigration and pro-big business, anti environmental regulation, are they?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

And socially progressive parties got 56% of the vote. But that’s split between about 4 parties.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

So you’re tallying the right wing and comparing vs one party on the “left”?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Its missleading to bass too much on that analysis. The parties don’t compete for the popular vote but to concentrate votes within seats they feel they can win.

No one was aiming to win the popular vote. I agree that’s a problem but we can’t really read to much into the split imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Let’s hope my doomongering is just that, with other countries in Europe starting to swing that way I hope it’s not sign of the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But that’s better than nothing, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

And ~54% of the votes went to left(ish) parties, so that’s something

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I fear that next election reform is going to do much better.

In the mean time, Labor may not have much of a mandate for progressive policies, they’ll be creeping to the right to quell support for reform party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Or having them in parliament might expose them as the one trick pony that they are.

I think Labour have to have a real effect on things in the next 5 years to show that the system can work. That will take the wind out of the right’s sails more than anything. Most of the reform vote is people feeling ignored, trod upon, thrown away. Labour has to make the people feel supported.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

There was an anti-genocide independent running against Starmer (the new PM) and they came in second. Image if they had won: biggest Labor majority in generations, you are all set to become PM and you loose your seat because you were vague about whether you support or oppose killing innocent women and children.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Labour lost four seats to independents running against its inaction on Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

and men?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yeah, it always kinda weirds me out that “killing women and children” is the rallying cry in most conflicts. Civilians. Killing civilians. That’s what’s bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Reminds me of an orville quote I can’t find now - something about firing on all the innocent families of a colony, and the navigator chimes in “yes, and all the single people as well!”

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 8K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.6K

    Posts

  • 116K

    Comments