-8 points
*

Half the content is screenshots from Reddit which in turn are half the time just screenshots from Twitter. May as well just keep the train going at this point.

On a more serious note, downvotes seem to be never any good for any forum or discussion platform of any kind. I’ve yet to see them used as a “not contributing“ button or whatever other idealistic definition sites come up with. It is almost universally a disagree button and every community I’ve seen that gets rid of it is better for it. I mean think about it: how many conversations have we all seen where people start bickering about votes? Passive aggressive edits because one person got one downvote, somebody acting as if their opinion is correct because they have 3 upvotes and the other person has -2. It’s honestly just not healthy and is primarily used as a cudgel rather than any meaningful sorting of comments and posts.

Twitter is already a shit hole of negativity and toxicity. Do they really need to add the ability downvote people?

Edit: I guess I was not direct enough about this point, but I am not against people controlling the content in front of them or deciding what is good/bad. I am saying specifically that the downvote mechanism specifically is not a good tool. Especially showing downvotes.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

While it’s true that the downvote often gets abused as a way to stifle otherwise-good discussion, without it it’s hard to deal with discussion that truly should NOT be happening.

There’s a reason election denial is more common and looks more legitimate on Facebook and Twitter. It’s because they don’t have a mechanism for people to nuke that discussion out of the top of the thread.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

Sure they can. Moderators/admins can remove comments. If you’re talking about just things thrown out on Facebook, at some point people need to unfriend/block people they don’t want to associate with, because unfortunately Facebook et al are never going to do what needs to be done.

I agree with you there is a problem of content moderation. But downvotes are not the solution and have never proven to be an effective deterrent. Removal/deplatforming is the only tool that has proven consistently effective. It’s why on a discord server i help run we have very low tolerance towards people who are sufficiently disruptive or have a chilling effect on conversations, even if they aren’t breaking the letter of the law. At some point you just have to get rid of these people or they cause a disproportionate amount of damage. It’s amazing what 5 people can do to a community of 500.

And before somebody goes on some rant about power-hungry mods and uses some example of how they were “banned for literally no reason“ where they probably did something but won’t show us what happened, the community actually really likes the way we do things and we only end up booting a couple of people a year because we have a handle on it lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

You don’t even need “power hungry mods” for that to go wrong, you just need mods who don’t care. That’s EXACTLY where Facebook and Twitter are right now. Getting content removed there is basically impossible, I’ve reported people for death threats and was told they never violated community standards.

If the platform isn’t going to moderate itself, the users should be able to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

that’s fine for a small discord group but it doesn’t scale. you can’t be that active in moderating millions of conversations.

downvotes (and hiding downvoted comments) is a community-driven way of signaling unacceptable behavior. it largely works, except in echo chambers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Moderators/admins can remove comments.

On Xitter? HA! They fired them first. It’s . . . mmmmm not a priority.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I prefer slashdot’s moderation system over any of the others.

Here, I’d like to see limitless upvoting, but downvotes bottom out at -3.

This may reduce dogpiling whilst allowing the downvoted parent a better chance to be engaged-with, and more opportunities to present their points.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think a cap is a great idea. Or just don’t show vote counts and push down downvoted stuff at least. But showing them to people tends to produce dog piling and false consensus

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

One of the things I like about Slashdot’s system is that it requires a reason for a downvote. Of course that doesn’t prevent people from downvoting disingenuously, but it nudges users away from downvoting just because they disagree.

I think for most social systems, the UI I’d use is a report or flag button that pops up a second step with a list of reasons, and like Slashdot, show the most selected reason next to low-ranked posts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Actually that’s a golden idea, I haven’t even thought about that, would love to see some software on here implementing a downvote cap, also crushing downvoted comments could be a better way instead of hiding them

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Downvotes were one of my favorite features of Reddit.

Some stupid shit doesn’t deserve discussion and is best off being shut down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That’s not how it plays out though that’s my entire point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For the most part it is how it plays out.

There may be exceptions but the benefits far outweigh the downsides.

Even just lurking on mastodon is frustrating because there is nothing to be done about trolls but engage or ignore and we all know folks can’t help but engage; it’s trolls raison d’être.

I generally assume those complaining about downvotes existing are frustrated trolls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

For evidence you’re right: see the downvotes on this comment. I’ve seen so many things downvoted that didn’t deserve it. People can misunderstand your comment and suddenly you’re at -20. Just a couple days ago this toxic fuck was telling me all sorts of weird things they claimed to know about me because I was downvoted for an opinion I wouldn’t have thought was unpopular at all. A couple people misunderstood, then a bunch more saw the downvotes and made false assumptions. It’s bizarre.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It is what it is! I don’t even see downvotes on my end but not surprised it happened. It’s magic internet points so whatever lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Blåhaj doesnt have downvotes and I occasionally miss being able to down vote people replying to requests with something that someone specifically said they don’t want in the full-text. For other stuff, report tends to be applicable, particularly spam and racist trolls who just come to advertise or attempt to change the culture of Lemmy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*

but it doesn’t want to emulate Reddit

well they already have the nazis and csam…

also let’s be honest; this is just another way for bigots to harass marginalised people on twitter.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

It can’t emulate Reddit as long as tweet length is capped for free users

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Wait until reddit introduces that “feature”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Mind blown, would you be interested in an executive position at Reddit. What other great ideas you got?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

What if we minted all the comments our users make into NFTs and sell them? Also, POGs. They’re due for a comeback.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

I don’t know if anyone remembers it, but Twitter actually had dislike as experimental feature for some users for some time before Elon, I think like 2 or 3 years ago, I remember having it on one of my accounts

News article from 2021 - https://www.pcmag.com/news/twitter-dislike-button-coming-soon-nope

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Yeah all that X can really do now for new features is roll out things that were half-built before Elon fired everyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 10K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments