June 26 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Monday plans to lay out how a $42 billion investment in expanding internet access will be divvied up among the nation’s 50 states, in an effort to give all Americans access to high-speed broadband by 2030.

The move will kick off the second leg of Biden’s tour highlighting how legislation passed by Congress during the first half of his term will affect average Americans, as his reelection bid gears up.

"We have an historic opportunity here to make a real difference in people’s lives and making sure that we deliver on that potential is what we’re about every day and to make sure that people feel that at their kitchen table, in their communities, in their backyards,” White House chief of staff Jeff Zients said.

Zients compared the broadband effort to President Franklin Roosevelt’s efforts in 1936 to bring electricity to rural America. The administration estimates there are some 8.5 million locations in the U.S. that lack access to broadband connections.

8 points

Or… and hear me out here… or, he could enforce existing laws concerning monopolies. Much of the country is Comcast only, where they charge more than they do in places where competition exists, and offer poorer service in exchange. Soaking the poor is literally their primary business model.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

Meaningless, unless we nationalize it.

The last time we invested in high speed Internet, ISPs just pocketed it

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Do you mean nationalize internet or nationalize the construction? For construction, I think it’d be fine if the states ran their own projects.

I agree it should not be given to the ISPs after last time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, I mean nationalize the ISPs themselves. It should be treated like a utility (which means municipalities would manage their own improvement projects)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I agree that it should be treated like a utility, but I don’t think utilities themselves are are nationalized. Or am I misunderstanding something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

My thoughts exactly. If sufficient protections aren’t in place for this, it’s a bad spend just like those early 90’s telecommunications bills. Good reading on the subject.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I work for a small ISP and regularly talk to other small ISPs. We fight hard for this grant money, and what we do get goes into expanding fiber coverage. The gov’t is getting wiser to the big boys pocketing the money and while it still happens, there is less of it going on now.

But all that said, we would overall be better served if internet service was nationalized.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United States | News & Politics

!usa@midwest.social

Create post

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

Community stats

  • 4.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 861

    Posts

  • 6.6K

    Comments