A lawsuit led by Palestinians and Palestinian Americans that accused President Joe Biden and other top U.S. officials of enabling genocide in Gaza was rejected Monday by a federal appeals court, which upheld a lower court’s dismissal of the lawsuit.

The three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that courts cannot review the executive branch’s decisions on foreign policy, even when there is a risk of breaking domestic and international law.

-22 points

God emperor Biden is immune it was an official decision.

permalink
report
reply
4 points
*

Lol, you always know how to show you don’t understand how anything works. This has been us policy for all time, it has nothing to do with Biden at all. This isn’t a matter for the courts, it’s a matter for the legislature.

Make sure to attend your government classes when you get to senior year, you desperately need a civics lesson.

E: LOL looks like someone beat me to the punch on you needing a civics lesson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

The other person is wrong and so are you. You should probably learn what you are talking about before frantically defending Genocide Joe

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Sounds like a separation of powers issue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

Sounds like a “political violence is already fully condoned as long as the president does it outside of the country” issue.

Makes one wonder why we’re supposed to be upset now that it’s legal inside of the country as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Go take a civics lesson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

courts cannot review the executive branch’s decisions on foreign policy

Then who can? And if nobody can, what’s the point of having laws for it?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Congress can.

https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-foreign-policy-powers-congress-and-president

Congress also plays an oversight role. The annual appropriations process allows congressional committees to review in detail the budgets and programs of the vast military and diplomatic bureaucracies. Lawmakers must sign off on more than a trillion dollars in federal spending every year, of which more than half is allocated to defense and international affairs. Lawmakers may also stipulate how that money is to be spent. For instance, Congress repeatedly barred the Obama administration from using funds to transfer detainees out of the military prison at Guantanamo Bay.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah that makes sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This was always going to be DOA. US courts can’t provide the relief they sought.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Surprising nobody.

Even before the Supreme Court ruling, you can’t legally challenge official US policy.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 438K

    Comments