91 points

“is understood to have told friends”

You heard it reportedly 3rd hand here first, folks.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

People are saying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

reports are coming in

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

“At least two people on Twitter said it, and journalism needs two sources right?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

More and more

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Modern Headlines be like “Obama Told Biden to Fuck Right Off”

And then the article, “There’s a possibility, in the multiverse, that there’s a timeline where perhaps Obama thought about wondering aloud in private to his bestie that mayyybe Biden should think about if he should contemplate whether to set aside a moment to decide if he should spend a minute thinking about debating stepping aside, maybe.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Yeah. These articles are getting tiresome. If it’s not right from Obamas mouth as he is endorsing the next person then get fucked inflammatory media

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

First of all: bullshit title from a bullshit rag.

Second: if you can’t quote that person or any sources and pull the whole “SOME MIGHT SAY” card. You’re just Fox News and lying to make headlines.

Stop posting this shit unless it’s confirmed. Read the damn article.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

Sadly, the title quote is not sourced to anyone.

Not Obama. Not to “close advisers”. Not to “anonymous barista in a DC Starbucks”.

Nobody.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Thanks Obama.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Reminder to tell EVERYONE to not only not listen to this, but to also put down the research pitchforks for a second and go all in Blue, regardless of the nominee. Don’t stay quiet. Worst case you won’t be able to speak safely this time next year.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

100%!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 482K

    Comments