Offensive term to be replaced as first step towards more changes in unprecedented reform of nomenclature rules

Scientists have voted to eliminate the names of certain plants that are deemed to be racially offensive. The decision to remove a label that contains such a slur was taken last week after a gruelling six-day session attended by more than 100 researchers, as part of the International Botanical Congress, which officially opens on Sunday in Madrid.

The effect of the vote will be that all plants, fungi and algae names that contain the word caffra, which originates in insults made against Black people, will be replaced by the word affra to denote their African origins. More than 200 species will be affected, including the coast coral tree, which, from 2026, will be known as Erythrina affra instead of Erythrina caffra.

The scientists attending the nomenclature session also agreed to create a special committee which would rule on names given to newly discovered plants, fungi and algae. These are usually named by those who first describe them in the scientific literature. However, the names could now be overruled by the committee if they are deemed to be derogatory to a group or race.

7 points

What’s the racist reference exactly?

permalink
report
reply
13 points

The word “caffra

for instance, numerous creatures, especially in Africa, have as part of their scientific name the word caffra, cafferiana, caffrorum, and other similar derivations of an Arabic word for “infidel” that is now considered a highly offensive racial slur and regarded as hate speech in South Africa.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Huh. Looks like it’s the same as this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaffir_(racial_term)

Yeah, those names should definitely be changed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

“The effect of the vote will be that all plants, fungi and algae names that contain the word caffra, which originates in insults made against Black people, will be replaced by the word affra to denote their African origins.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Only an estimate of 60% of the international community approved of this. I’m curious what arguments against renaming it would be? Maybe cost? Although is a little whiteout really that problematic? I could introduce to opposition some simple software methods to iteratively erase that c in front of the word.

permalink
report
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And now it’s expected to be changed in every instance it was used, wasting time and resources for something that doesn’t change anything known about the species itself

permalink
report
parent
reply

science

!science@lemmy.world

Create post

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren’t liked generally. I’ve posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don’t screen everything, lrn2scroll

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 14K

    Comments