The cost of simply retrieving an answer from the Web is infinitely smaller than the cost of generating a new one.

Great interview with Sasha Luccioni from Huggingface on all the ways that using generative AI for everything is both a) hugely costly compared to existing methods, and b) insane.

6 points

Tech could save us, but not AI. The tech that could isn’t profitable enough to do so, though, so it’s not happening. And it’s not like oil corp. shareholders & execs are gonna accept a pay cut so that their subsidies could be redirected to more ecologically sustainable tech. Nope, we live in capitalist hell. At least, until we don’t.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I’m cheered that we now have so much wind and solar wanting to come online that it’s straining grid interconnects so countries (US and NL for example) suddenly have to spend a bundle on infra so that the power can get across continents to where it’s needed

this is a very cool problem to have: oh no! we have too much new clean energy!

it may not be sufficient, but it’s an excellent start

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

But bill gates says not to worry about it, because ai will solve the climate disaster it’s creating. -_-

permalink
report
reply
9 points

He was also claiming AI would destroy us a few years ago. (Not talking about climate, skynet style)

Side note: listening to him is as bad as listening to a celebrity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Maybe worse, since society considers him a SME on subjects he isn’t, she they listen to his word as though it’s coming from an actual SME.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It’s not creating a climate disaster, just amplifying the existing one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

All we gotta do is ask chatgpt how to fix it. Ezpz

permalink
report
reply
-17 points

Nope it isn’t. You blame AI companies for pollution they didn’t generate. Blame the energy sector.

Why the hell aren’t we using mix of nuclear and renewables in this day and age is beyond me

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Since we aren’t using those it is in fact a climate disaster currently and they know that.

Assuming you want to ground your argument in our reality.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

holy shit your post history of full of takes this bad, that’s an impressive track record of dim. must be exhausting

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

oh wow there’s some literal “it’s not a nazi unless it’s an old dead German” shit in there, they’re that kind of fash debatebro

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

yeah sorry I kinda undersold it

thank fuck they came out swinging

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

yeah, they don’t teach much about fascist atrocities in ethiopia, and then people feel compelled to defend the good name of the boys in the black shirts because the poor dupes didn’t build the concentration camps – just were allied to the builders.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-18 points

And yet, my opponents in discussion failed to provide good counterarguments. You aren’t going to convince me of anything by hating my post history

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

And yet, my opponents in discussion

good gods you’re going to be the most insufferable kind of person, aren’t you

You aren’t going to convince me of anything

this was a bit of a given

bet you also think the climate cost of cryptocurrency is also a failing of the energy sector to deliver clean power to the innocent sweet little industrial-scale mining tycoons, don’t you

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Nope it isn’t. You blame AI companies for pollution they didn’t generate. Blame the energy sector.

don’t talk about providing good counterarguments, please

permalink
report
parent
reply

TechTakes

!techtakes@awful.systems

Create post

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here’s the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

Community stats

  • 2.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 558

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments

Community moderators