32 points

That was probably the intention of the DDoS attack. Screw always-online singleplayer games.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Do you know if there’s any statement or if it’s known who did this?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m a bit wary of their DDoS claims. This happened during their Battle.net sale (which would increase traffic) and during the outage their CS was telling people to try multiple times (which is a great way to hammer the servers).

It’s likely they just couldn’t handle the load, or ran into the thundering herd problem, and just claimed ddos because they didn’t know better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

While I don’t condone DDoS attacks, the only reason for D4 to be online-only is monetization IMO: Blizzard wants to sell cosmetics, so people have to see other people wearing them. There is little gameplay benefit from being an MMO-lite.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

Probably all sorts of datamining regarding the way people play also. Can’t do that so easily if people are playing offline.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Brilliant insight. They probably are tracking metrics on what will encourage people to buy stuff the most too

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Activision owns patents on the following:

  • A system that tracks what store items you might be interested in, and places you in matches with high-skilled players who own that item, making you associate the item with high skill

  • A system that places you against lower-skilled opponents immediately after you bought an item, making you associate making a purchase with being better.

From here to “they want you to look at other players and how expensive their shit is” is only one step. Honestly at this point I’m even surprised they’re not faking it entirely, making other players just happen to be wearing expensive skins on your screen even if the actual account hasn’t bought that. It’s not like you can check anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I experienced this first hand playing wow. The team will straight up send out email surveys asking if players would be willing to pay x for y service with different people getting different prices. They calculate these things to extract as much money from the dedicated fans as possible. I went back to playing the private servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Probably looking at the wardrobe to see what people like looks-wise with what’s in-game already. Then ensure they push more of that into the store.

Never open the store.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I came to the same conclusion as you: why would people buy their stuff if they could just run an unlocker script or edit a config file to give that stuff to them? It’s basically malicious DRM

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

All DRM is malicious, and DRM is why not to buy. Plenty of other games that you can buy and also own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Potentially unpopular opinion, I like running into random other players in the world, particularly when doing events. I don’t give a fuck about Blizzard’s cosmetics and, frankly, unless I’m examining people, I can’t even tell what they’re wearing half the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

And you should have the option to do so.

But that doesn’t mean other people shouldn’t have the option to play offline if they so choose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This one is hard for me to have an opinion on.

Loot rolls need to be controlled by the server, or else people will just exploit all that stuff.

Diablo doesn’t have a lot of mechanics that really need players to interact with each other, but games like that and WOW are entirely based around gear grind. All accomplishment requires players to have a level playing field or players just won’t want to play. It’s just wierd like that.

If people want an offline game, they should buy an offline game. It’s not that smart to buy an always-online game and then complain about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
3 points

At least there should be a mandatory “Always On” warning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Online requirement for single player content is insane.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

It’s a dealbreaker for me, personally. I just won’t buy a game like that, no matter how much I want to play it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yup. Unless it’s a multiplayer-only game, there’s no reason to require an always-on Internet connection except to data mine you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Forced online is literally the only reason my husband and I didn’t buy this game. We can’t be the only ones and they’re definitely missing out on a good chunk of money

permalink
report
reply

PC Master Race

!pcmasterrace@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘stupid’ questions. The world won’t be made better or worse by snarky comments schooling naive newcomers on Lemmy.

Notes:

Community stats

  • 504

    Monthly active users

  • 361

    Posts

  • 7.1K

    Comments