56 points

We definitely should. Fucking good luck actually getting this across the line though.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Would be great to aggressively and progressively tax every wasteful thing rich people do. Yachts. Third homes. Private jets.

If it’s something rich people do? Need to tell their lobbyists to STFU and double the tax rate on it.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

Let’s ban them instead. If they’re poisoning our atmosphere so much and it’s purely for luxury/convenience then we shouldn’t have them at all

permalink
report
reply
-3 points

Maybe banning is a bit extreme, but we can leverage virtual meetings more for those that need these in person meetings, and maybe permit X amount of personal flights per day/month among all private jet owners or something.

Sadly these things take time, time which I’m not sure we have as a luxury anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Eh, if you can afford a private jet you can more than afford last minute first class flights anywhere. The rich have plenty of other less destructive luxuries at their disposal, I have a hard time feeling sorry for them if they can’t fly their private jet whenever and wherever they like. It’s time we start treating the wealthy like normal people instead of allowing them to exert their power and privilege to our demise

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not saying this to shill for private jet owners, but to shed some light on this. A big part of why private jets are preferable is that passengers can drive up to the plane and just take off immediately. No check ins, no security, no wait times, no boarding times.

Banning private jets isn’t easy to do. A more practical solution might be to eliminate security theater, cut down boarding times, end overbooking, and heavily tax private jets.

If the outcome we want is a reduced carbon footprint, we need to focus on things that are actionable, and getting private jets banned is unlikely to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Wait. We don’t?

permalink
report
reply
45 points

We do, just at a lower rate than flying on a commercial flight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Socialism for the rich. Capitalism for the rest of us

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It depends on where they land.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

“Tax the rich”. This just won’t happen.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yeah it happens all the time. They tax them more, the people go yay, they then use a new loophole. Probably one they introduced in the same bill. When you can buy your policies you’re never gonna be caught up in all this tax shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.3K

    Posts

  • 29K

    Comments

Community moderators