Like if it’s even an option for you at all, make the move. It’s such a better quality of life it’s crazy, cannot be exaggerated.
Obviously not easy, but if it’s even at all potentially feasible do what you can to make it happen.
the only part of the US that is walkable is the part built before cars, so mostly just the northeast, like NYC and north. any other cities suck for walking compared to anywhere else on earth.
the west coast is the most inhuman landscape ever created on planet earth. its is so ugly and awful.
Portland and Seattle are lovely and have many walkable neighborhoods. SF is expensive, and so is the entire bay really, but Oakland, Berkeley, and Emeryville are very walkable and ever so slightly more affordable compared to being on the Peninsula itself. Many of the Central Valley cities are unwalkable car based hell holes, and so is much of SoCal for that matter, but I have friends who live in Sacramento and they won’t shut up about how happy they are to go car free and how the city is dramatically expanding bike infrastructure. It’s very neighborhood dependent still, but I don’t see why they’d be lying to me about it and they did indeed sell their cars in favor of ebikes, so the proof is in the pudding there.
Davis, and the areas near it, is famously bike friendly. There are bike lanes pretty much everywhere, and the car drivers are acclimated to bike transit enough that they aren’t crazy dangerous.
Sacramento is a bigger city, so it’s probably a bit harder to really bike transform it fully, but hopefully the process continues.
(Besides NYC) what walkable cities?
Boston is extremely walkable, it’s a relatively small big city and most of it was built before cars. I’ve got a picture of my old apartment building with dirt streets and a horse carriage out front. I used to regularly walk from one end of the city to the other for leisure. The T is surprisingly good public transit for america too. They’ve even been doing free fares on some of the bus routes for the last few years, and just extended that experiment because it was pretty successful.
People drag it for not being a grid sometimes (the “paved-over cowpaths” myth) but that’s because the streets go around hills since they needed to be traversed by people and horses.
Oh my God my partner and I recently looked at a bunch of cities to decide where to apply for jobs, and we were fucking floored when we saw how expensive Boston was.
Why the fuck is rent more than NYC and SF??? It was literally over $1000 more per month than the other cities on our list including DC, Seattle, and Chicago.
DC is very walkable. The metro is slightly less extensive than NYC but is way more reliable imo and also not nasty.
There are also pockets of most major cities that are walkable. Unfortunately it isn’t easy to know where they are unless you live there. The only clue is to look at places that are within 1 block of grocery stores, which is probably the top constraint.
There’s https://www.walkscore.com/ but it can be both too critical and too lax when rating some places.
Developers have been using walkscore as a marketing tool for years. The correlation between the score and places that have gentrified or are gentrifying is pretty significant.
That’s also the nature of urban development in the United States. Highly walkable areas are gonna correlate with those that are getting all the “revitalization funds” that build new infrastructure. We already know that American cities don’t want to invest in the areara as they exist.
If I had to be stuck in the great satan forever, I would bust a fat nut if I could live in San Francisco or Honolulu.
how do i acclimate to yurt culture instead
