-1 points

we could, at any time, ‘deal’ with this woman in a way that ensures no other fascist shitbags would ever be brave enough to open their bigoted mouths again, but y’all are chickenshit, so she will continue to run her stupid mouth and influence other morons.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Right, Hitler killing himself was where we fucked up. If we just hadn’t been so chicken shit and had handled him ourselves, his ideas wouldn’t be around anymore! /S

Ideas don’t die with people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

i didn’t say it would kill the idea. i said it would make the people that like the idea keep their mouth shut out of fear.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No, it would make her a martyr and empower more morons to take her place. Do you not see what’s going on in Palestine as an example, or are you fucking dumb?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points
LGBTQ Nation Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [Medium] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: LGBTQ Nation Bias: Left
Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/lgbtq-nation/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

permalink
report
reply
37 points

We now know, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this fine lady munches ham-wallet all damn day.

Cheers!

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Fat tits? Is that some slag I as a old person don’t get?

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I appreciate the joke, I was gonna ask about the chicks with ducks.

At the same time, making light of these weirdos (republicans) isn’t worth it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Quack!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Omg you can’t just use the q word like that

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

An English cigarette

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Not to be confused with the British, who are known to ask, “Oi, can I bum a queer?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

I mean, some gay guys wear the F word proudly. So, she’s not wrong about that?

Kinda weird for her to be obsessed with other people’s sex lives though. Think she’s insecure?

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The F word has been used for a lot of heinous shit - most LGBT+ folks I know avoid that word and, personally, I appreciate that because its forever burned into a painful memory of mine. If Gen Z/Alpha want to try reclaiming it I wish them the best of luck but I’ll never use it myself. I hope millenials were the last generation to really feel the sting hurt bad en masse?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’ve definitely seen the Tumblr crowd reclaiming it

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

A lot of Gen Zs and millennials use it in a reclaimed way. It varies between groups in the community though. It’s not super common, at least in my experience, and most people I’ve met that do use it make sure it’s okay with the people that they’re talking to

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In my experience as a millennial we’re the youngest reclaiming it. It’s usually old leathermen reclaiming it. Though I do have one friend who her and I will call each other it in response to the other calling her a transphobic slur.

In short I don’t think this reclamation is going to stick unless the baby bears start seeing it as a position of power like dyke got. It’s a word the young associate with the pain of the old and the old use to take away the sting of our pasts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

One purpose of someone personally reclaiming a slur is to reduce the sting of something used to hurt them. This is different than how it is being used in this quote, where it is being used against a cis woman the speaker considers masculine. It is being used to cause harm, here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 471K

    Comments