86 points
*

They won $96ish million, took the lump payout of $57 million.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

That’s a really affordable military.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

lol I thought I edited it before anyone saw that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Mistakes are forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Wonder what they’re gonna do with their $23 million.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Hookers and blow

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

How the fuck can you win 96 million on a lottery and only receive 57 mil?

Is that a Freedom©®™ thing the rest of us wouldn’t understand? 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Taxes.
…Which the rest of the world understands well. So why don’t you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

In germany the lottery is state owned and the tax is applied before money is added to the jackpot. So if the jackpot is 50mil you get 50mil

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Nope, that’s not what reduced it. It was the lump pay out. You only get the full amount if you take the 21 year payout.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I don’t understand being taxed on winnings, to be honest

But yous get taxed on working abroad 😂😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

You have a choice: get 57M or get an annuity that costs 57M and pays out 96M over two decades

If you took the 57 million and invested it in an index fund you would probably do better than 96M over the same timespan, though you would probably be taxed more and have to be responsible enough to not spend the money instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The lottery has 2 possible payout methods. One is over time, something like 21 years, IIRC, that will net you the 96 million. There is also the lump payout option that will net you smaller amount overall but more all at once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Great, even the lottery is P2W

permalink
report
reply
27 points

stefan mandel won a bunch of jackpots in australia and the us during the 1970s and 80s doing the same thing, buying all the numbers.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

My coworkers and I had a fun lunch calculating minimum purchase amounts to guarantee or significantly increase winning chances for some smaller local lotteries. There’s a surprising amount of chances to do this especially if you pool your money and don’t have to wait for receipts to be printed. There was one local lottery for ~11m and would only require ~600k to be most likely to win based on the average ticket sales of that specific one.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Everyone realizes the risk is that if someone else wins you get half the pot and if three people do you get 1/3rd and so forth. Large lotteries tend to have large sales and are more likely to have split winnings.

permalink
report
reply

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

!weirdnews@real.lemmy.fan

Create post

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like “Watch:” or “Look:” can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline’s intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you’ve got nothing positive to say, don’t say it.

Violators will be banned at mod’s discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally…

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 758

    Posts

  • 4.5K

    Comments