-4 points

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Wow, so surprising they would pick one of the most hotly contested senate races in the country with a vulnerable incumbent Democrat. Total coincidence I’m sure, and not at all an effort to help the Republican.

The green party cares about the environment man.

It’s just that it’s the political environment. Fucking trash.

permalink
report
reply
-17 points

Well that’s YOUR opinion. Which you totally have a right to. As I have a right to my opinion, which differs from yours.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Funny how your opinion only comes around every 4 years and then Disappears back to russia

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points
*

Funny how your opinion only comes around every 4 years and then Disappears back to russia

I’m not sure what you mean. I vote in local elections too, so not just every 4 years.

And I have been voting for longer than you have been alive.

And Greens are in other elections besides presidential:

Californians have elected 55 of the 226 office-holding Greens nationwide. Other states with high numbers of Green elected officials include Pennsylvania (31), Wisconsin (23), Massachusetts (18) and Maine (17). Maine has the highest per capita number of Green elected officials in the country and the largest Green registration percentage with more than 29,273 Greens comprising 2.95% of the electorate as of November 2006.[68] Madison, Wisconsin is the city with the most Green elected officials (8), followed by Portland, Maine (7).

Also:

https://montanafreepress.org/2024/08/21/green-party-candidate-files-to-join-u-s-senate-race/

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/3127249/eight-green-party-write-ins-will-run-in-the-general-election/

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

There’s a bit of a history of the Republicans in Montana funding the Green Party to serve as spoilers.

The way first-past-the-post elections work makes this pretty much inevitable.

Let’s look at 3 scenarios:


Scenario 1:

  • Tester (D) 1001 votes
  • Sheehey (R) 1000 votes
  • Green Party: 0 votes

Tester wins


Scenario 2:

  • Tester (D) 1000 votes
  • Sheehey (R) 1000 votes
  • Green Party: 1 vote

Tie between Tester and Sheehey, forcing a special election (Montana rules; other states use games of chance)


Scenario 3:

  • Tester (D) 999 votes
  • Sheehey (R) 1000 votes
  • Green Party: 2 votes

Sheehey wins


This means that voting for a minor third party instead of the Democrat actively harms the ability to elect somebody who is better-aligned with your views.

Vote your heart in the primary. Vote strategically in the general.

permalink
report
reply
-15 points

None of that matters to me. I’m still voting green this election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Exactly what a Republican would say.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points
*

Exactly what a Republican would say.

I don’t really know much about that.

For me personally, if I were Republican, I’d say so. And probably vote Trump. But I’m not either of those things.

So were you implying that I personally am a Republican, or just that some republicans may vote Green Party?

You do realize that the majority of my postings are for socialism causes, right? https://lemmy.world/c/socialist

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Check out OP’s bio if you want to understand what they are doing here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 429K

    Comments