Another lawsuit against Internet archive sigh

88 points

Can mfs stop attacking the internet archive im so tired of this shit

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I’d suppose owners/main team would be annoyed AF as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
82 points

Those companies are such a drag for human society because they are afraid of their bottom line. the Music Industry and Amazon also would have burned down the Library of Alexandria if they had deemed it worrisome to their profit.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

And theres still no proof that every download truly is a lost sale. It’s all just make believe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I think it’d be completely unrealistic to think that there are no lost sales…whether or not the amount they’re losing is actually meaningful would be a better question…

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I definitely understand this take but there are a lot of things that I would have never watched if I hadn’t torrented it. Many things I do want to see more of I pay for of course but a lot of it I would just never have viewed or listened to in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The Internet is rapidly being ground down by all these companies.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

And it sucks because the Internet is meant to be for everyone or at least that is what AJ from Fairy Odd parents said!

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

These records should have been in the public domain many years ago. Copyright law needs a thorough reform

permalink
report
reply
9 points

But there is no money in that, please, think of the corporations! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The labels’ lawsuit filed in a federal court in Manhattan said the Archive’s “Great 78 Project” functions as an “illegal record store” for songs by musicians including Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald, Miles Davis and Billie Holiday.

Representatives for the Internet Archive did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the complaint.

The Internet Archive is already facing another federal lawsuit in Manhattan from leading book publishers who said its digital-book lending program launched in the pandemic violates their copyrights.

A judge ruled for the publishers in March, in a decision that the Archive plans to appeal.

The labels’ lawsuit said the project includes thousands of their copyright-protected recordings, including Bing Crosby’s “White Christmas,” Chuck Berry’s “Roll Over Beethoven” and Duke Ellington’s “It Don’t Mean a Thing (If It Ain’t Got That Swing)”.

The lawsuit said the recordings are all available on authorized streaming services and “face no danger of being lost, forgotten, or destroyed.”


I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply

datahoarder

!datahoarder@lemmy.ml

Create post

Who are we?

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data – legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they’re sure it’s done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

We are one. We are legion. And we’re trying really hard not to forget.

– 5-4-3-2-1-bang from this thread

Community stats

  • 394

    Monthly active users

  • 193

    Posts

  • 1.4K

    Comments

Community moderators