cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/21840859

White Stripes singer angered after Trump aide shares social media post using clip of band’s hit Seven Nation Army

7 points

You know I want to dislike this guy because I thought the white stripes were REALLY overrated…but then he absolutely goes nuts helping vinyl explode and now this…I can’t like the guy but goddamn he is absolutely the least worst. Go Jack

permalink
report
reply
0 points

This hits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
7 points

Remember everyone, only notyourworld gets to decide what music is!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Aw man, and here I thought only my world mattered. Sucks

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Don’t threaten. Fucking do it.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

You know it doesn’t seem like all that long ago that people were being sued or threatened for playing music in shops or in the back office of a hotel and stuff like that. It might have been urban legend at the time when the music industry was over reacting to Napster, KaZaA, Limewire, Bearshare, etc, etc. but it is true that those venues officially need a license for any music they play in public. So how come a nationwide advertising campaign can make use of music, without the permission of the artist, and not be sued into oblivion by the RIAA? Or does the artist not own the copyright to their own work? Or does the RIAA sympathise more with gentle, kind Billionaires than nasty greedy non billionaires??

permalink
report
reply
1 point

In all likelihood they license it through a licensing library and the original rights holder isn’t in the loop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The RIAA is a tool for filfthy rich assholes, not the working class

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The Electronic Music scene has the Association For Electronic Music (AFEM), because the RIAA are insane about public performance rules and would completely kneecap the club scene if they were in charge. If DJs can’t perform the shit in their collection without explicit rights for every track, the scene falls apart.

Interestingly, Trump could likely get away with hiring DJs and playing club anthems at his rallies, but that would probably alienate his base pretty severely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

A friend of mine made one of White’s iconic guitars. That friend offered to make a copy of that iconic guitar for me. That friend was threatened with a lawsuit from White if that guitar were copied. I’m not sure that case would have held up in court given that the guitar in question is a copy of a copy, but…

permalink
report
reply
1 point

How did he even know about it? Did he post on Instagram that he was making Jack White’s guitar for a friend?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Take it or leave it. I’m omitting a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How did Jack White find out your friend offered to make you a copy of his guitar?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Which guitar in particular are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 429K

    Comments