Oh those sad, sorry publishers. It’ll be so hard on them if they can’t make as many billion dollars per year off publicly funded research. How will they ever survive on less than $19 billion?

FTA:

Although open-access advocates and library groups support the move, opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work—and cut into the $19 billion academic publishing industry’s profit margins.

4 points

The whole article’s worth reading.

Currently, the academic publishing industry’s business model relies largely on an author’s willingness to submit work for free—or even pay to publish it—and the publisher’s ability to turn around and sell that research to academic libraries through expensive journal subscriptions. Libraries at doctoral-granting institutions spend about 80 percent of their materials budgets on such subscriptions …

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Sounds like an industry that doesn’t deserve to exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

opponents argue the new policy will limit researchers’ ability to maintain control of their published work

From what I understand, researchers already aren’t able to maintain control of their published work because of the publishers.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Typically your work belongs to the person who pays you for it. So it seems to me that if it’s paid for by the public, then it’s owned by the public.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Oh nooooooo. Anyways…

permalink
report
reply

Libraries

!libraries@literature.cafe

Create post

For talk of all things related to libraries!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

Community stats

  • 421

    Monthly active users

  • 89

    Posts

  • 255

    Comments

Community moderators