Nothing tells me more that you care about my privacy than sharing my data with hundreds or thousands of companies.

38 points

Consent-o-matic for the win.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Does that actually block “legitimate” cookies too? Because many of the pop ups are now set up in a way that “reject all” doesn’t reject those, and I honestly don’t trust that the extension is doing anything beyond “clicking” “reject all” on your behalf, meaning the hundreds of “legitimate” cookies will still get through.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the plugin knows about it then it can handle it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

But how do I know that it does?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Personally, I just use Cookie AutoDelete in addition to the cookie dialog removal extension (in my case, “I Still Don’t Care About Cookies”).

permalink
report
parent
reply

nice, thanks

will use this one, as the “i dont care about cookies” extension seems to cease to work nowadays

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

From memory I don’t care accepts all cookies where consent-o-matic will actively opt out of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah, you should use an extension for removing cookies along with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I think just for desktop at the moment unfortunately

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nice, I used “I don’t care about cookies” for a while which just accepted or hid the pop-up and then blocked tracking locally. They got bought out by some corpo tho so I stopped using them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
2 points

Ohh its available for android. Nice!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I wonder what it would be like if there was a setting in Firefox that opened each website in it’s own container without any faff. Firefox automatically creates the container for the website if it doesn’t already exist and opens the website within it.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

You can pretty much do this with Firefox. I’m on my phone but ublock origin can block 3rd party cookies and scripts. This breaks a lot of sites but it also lets you turn those back on, on a case-by-case basis. Plus various other Firefox settings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’m no expert in this matter, but it’s probably much more effective to tweak your firefox than clicking around in those cookie banners.

I personally like uMatrix, which offers granular control which sites can run scripts or set cookies. But it is clearly targeted at advanced users.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Like Linux, I don’t want it to be the hobby; I just want to use it. If every website opened in it’s only container then there is no care about cookies because they can’t track you across the web, nor can they try to steal others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is uMatrix developed again? Because, since it didn’t update webextension APIs, it got much less effective than uBlock Origin with a medium blocking setting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not as far as I’m aware.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve only got superficial knowledge on this, but I believe Firefox does roughly that out of the box.

The feature that you’re asking for is called “first-party isolation”. It was implemented by the Tor Browser devs and upstreamed into Firefox, and it’s what the whole Container technology foots upon. You can activate it in Firefox by setting privacy.firstparty.isolate in about:config to true.

But as I understand, Firefox now ships dynamic first-party isolation (dFPI) out of the box. Which is FPI, with a few exceptions to ensure web compatibility.
This is part of a wider effort called State Partitioning. And they market it to users as Total Cookie Protection. It’s a bit confusing…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That would be awesome.

Defaulting to “Private Browsing” achieves most of the desired effect, but I still have to switch to regular mode for sites I sign in to.

Needless to say, my technique is only effective because I’m a socoal pariah who doesn’t sign into anything owned by Meta or Google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Your method would annoy me because of having to log in to websites ‘all of the time’ instead of allowing at least some to have persistent logins. Losing website preferences would also be annoying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yep. That’s another issue with it.

I “solve” (not really a solution) that by opening a new non-private tab just when visiting sites that I sign into.

It’s certainly not perfect, even some places that I shop run crazy amounts of tracking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Lol, The Verge.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

That was exactly my inspiration for this meme. But it’s by far not the only site that does this

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We value your privacy = your privacy has value which we can sell

permalink
report
reply
2 points

EasyList Cookie List for the win!

permalink
report
reply

Cybersecurity - Memes

!cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

Create post

Only the hottest memes in Cybersecurity

Community stats

  • 563

    Monthly active users

  • 80

    Posts

  • 1.2K

    Comments