34 points
*

I would actually take The Intercept off that list and replace with Drop Site news, since that’s the new site that Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Grim started after their departure from The Intercept. Basically the PMC and NGO class went and enshittified The Intercept

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I didn’t know this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

All good, I’m a disgruntled founding subscriber of The Intercept and went to one of their live events, so I have an axe to grind

permalink
report
parent
reply

The intercept still regularly has worthwhile reporting, but no way would they publish anything like what Drop Site is currently.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Should we include breaking points because it includes Ryan and Krystal ball, or exclude it because they co-host with reactionaries?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I only followed Ryan Grim’s writing stuff not his video ventures. I’d leave that up to others to decide but I think hosting with reactionaries designates that it’s an entertainment product with news like characteristics. Do they do any of their own reporting or is it just hot takes?

permalink
report
parent
reply

For the most part, it’s a morning show slash news roundup podcast. They do have some partnerships, like with Jordan Chariton of Status Coup who reports on Flint, MI and East Palestine, OH.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

They do some reporting, but it’s a lot of hot takes. A few days ago they had a really in depth talk with Jeffrey Sachs about how the US and Wall Street screwed over Russia after the illegal disillusion of the USSR (he was one of the architects of the color revolution in Poland but becomes very disillusioned by the mid 90s, so he would come across as very credible to any lib you show it to)

permalink
report
parent
reply

Wouldn’t call them totally enshittified but agreed that Drop Site has the better reporting now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The Intercept is still pretty great. That happened a while ago and the articles they are putting out still cover the same kind of topics and from the same positions, at least that I’ve noticed. Every article I’ve seen has been covering stuff that the mainstream media wouldn’t, and from the left. I don’t go to their site to skim, but I haven’t seen any bad articles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

In my time at The Intercept, I’ve watched the newsroom increasingly become dominated by management and bureaucrats whose numbers continue to swell as the number of people who actually produce news dwindles. While the Intercept now has one poor copy editor for the entire website, it employs two staff attorneys, as well as a legal fellow, a chief strategy officer, a chief digital officer, a business coordinator, a senior director of development and an associate director of development, a product manager, a senior director of operations, a chief of staff, and a chief operating officer. And for the first time in The Intercept’s history, as of Monday, the new editor-in-chief now answers to the CEO.

The company’s org chart, pictured below, provides a sense of how top-heavy it has become with business hires (basically the entire left half). Organizational chart for The Intercept current as of April 26, 2024. (Credit: The Intercept)

This orgy of management largesse has coincided with layoffs of the editor-in-chief, managing editor, national security editor, copy editor, photo editor, multiple senior editors, social media editor, as well as writers and reporters. There are passionate editors and writers left who still want to do news, like Ryan Grim and Ali Gharib, but they are toiling under the impossible odds of the new management regime.

https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/why-im-resigning-from-the-intercept

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Klip is awesome. I’m so glad he went out on his own to do what he does best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m aware of what happened. I’ve read that article.

I’m not sure what you think that has to do with what I said.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

I didn’t see this one on the list: https://www.qiaocollective.com/

Though tbf it doesn’t look like they publish very often these days :/

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Skipped the entire of 2023, interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

More lefitsh than leftist, but In These Times and The Real News are generally good for U.S. labor news.

@DivineChaos100@hexbear.net posted a long list of news sources a while back, both mainstream and left, from a wide range of tendencies.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Didn’t real news drop Chris Hedges bc he said he wasn’t voting for Biden when he was still in

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes. We’re going to have serious complaints about any U.S.-based site. Their excuse was because of something to do with non-profit status and rules about endorsements. They attack Biden all the time, though, and had good coverage of the would-be railroad strike.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes and also got rid of Paul Jay for the same thing

permalink
report
parent
reply

Unfortunately that list isn’t online anymore so i’m working from inoreader now

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
permalink
report
reply
8 points

I think Black Agenda Report deserves a mention.

permalink
report
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 1.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments