2 points

Democrats are limp wristed when it comes to Israel. Expect more death, they won’t raise a finger to stop it. Republicans aren’t any better.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Republicans are far, far worse… Why are you framing it this way? This is just intellectual dishonesty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Both sides huh? Last I heard the Democrats are negotiating a peace treaty and the Republikkklowns are writing finish them on the bombs.

What’s your angle?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

Amazing how that it’s already done peace deal still isn’t done. Almost like dems and bibi don’t care about getting it done

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I love your blaming the dems as the world sits by. It’s wild how the dems are more powerful than world combined. Weird almost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

The US has presented 3 separate peace deals that everyone has accepted but Netanyahu has sabotaged at the last minute. That is not the fault of “the Dems”.

At the same time, Republicans have yet to do anything but cheer on the genocide in Gaza and the violence in the West Bank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

The lobbyists getting fat and rich off their layouts from weapons manufacturers will ensure it never gets done. Who do you think Israel is getting all their guns and drones and missiles from? Guess what? It’s the same place Hamas gets theirs from. The only difference between them is the number of bank accounts and off-the-books deals on the way there.

Those bombs will keep flowing to both sides as long as money keeps flowing back. Ideology has nothing to do with it. It’s all about the cash.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

As the Zionist elite are the real owners of America, I think nothing will happen.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

Just say Jews. You mean Jews.

Globalists, Zionist elite, international cabal…just say Jews.

Your dog whistles are heard loud and clear on the internet these days.

We really need to Make Nazis Afraid Again

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re the anti-semite here, you’re the one mixing up Jews with a genocidal terrorist group.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not all Jews are Zionists as not all Zionists are Jews, there are plenty of christian nationalists who are Zionists.

Anti-zionism isn’t the same as anti-Semitism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There is a difference between “Jews” and “Zionists”. Same as there’s a difference between “Whites” and “White Supremacists”.

Where it starts getting weird are the non-Jewish Zionists and the non-white white supremacists.

https://apnews.com/article/enrique-tarrio-capitol-riot-seditious-conspiracy-sentencing-da60222b3e1e54902db2bbbb219dc3fb

https://www.opb.org/article/2023/07/21/proud-boy-tusitala-tiny-toese-sentenced-8-years-prison-violence-portland-rallies/

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Do you know how many Americans the US government kills in the US? Why would they give a shit about one more far away?

Lol.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I think people forget that cops are part of the government and they definitely kill innocent people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They responded to this in the past: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/israel-west-bank-and-gaza-travel-advisory.html

This kind of thing is entirely predictable and US citizens have been warned by the State Department about there being an active conflict happening in the area.

So a US citizen died while ignoring a travel advisory from the US government. US citizenship doesn’t make someone invincible, and it doesn’t mean the US military is going to avenge your death (or whatever fantasy you can come up with) if you’re deliberately ignoring the warnings about an area of the world being dangerous. The obligation of protecting citizens was fulfilled by issuing the warning.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

There is no legal obligation to protect citizens. Is there an ethical obligation? Kind of no, for reasons you listed, but kind of yes, because the cause of death was predictable and it’s something in the US has partial control over.

From a practical standpoint, we all agree that the US won’t do anything, because they certainly aren’t worried about pacifists in war zones where one of the sides is getting its weapons from the United States.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah a country has an ethical obligation to protect it’s citizens. Which is why countries issue travel advisories. If you ignore the warnings your country is giving you, that ethical obligation doesn’t apply because it was already fulfilled by the warning.

“Don’t go over there, it’s dangerous!”

“Screw you, I’m not listening to you!”

Problem happens.

“Why did you allow this dangerous thing to happen???”

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Although there are a bunch of ways the US can apply pressure. I think people overestimate the power ceasing weapon sales would have. While I believe it is the ethically right thing to do. It wouldn’t really hinder Israel’s ability to wage this war. It is allowing them to maintain their very vast stockpiles. But they could probably go years without even getting low, much less running out, without external weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Funny that just last week an American was shot in the head, executed by Hamas, and there wasn’t an Intercept article mentioning it. Maybe it’s just not fashionable to be outraged about it, and it wouldn’t get enough clicks.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

“Why don’t you ever talk about the deaths centrists aren’t happy about?!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I would hope that if you are any kind of US citizen, you would not be happy about it either. There are forest and trees, but you only see one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not. I’m also not cynically using it to whatabout in favor of a genocidal apartheid state like you’re doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We only fund one of these warring terrorist groups. Do not see that difference?

Our taxes paid for the killing of a US citizen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s outrageous. We should immediately stop funding Hamas.

No more weapons packages.
No more military funding.
The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group should stop supporting them now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

People expect terrorists to shoot innocent people in the head. They don’t accept it when people claiming to fight terrorists shoot innocent people in the head.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Ask a Palestinian in the West Bank if they think Hamas are terrorists or freedom fighters.

“Terrorist” is a thought-terminating cliche.

Both Israel and Hamas are religious extremists who exploit and murder innocent civilians. Neither one is worthy of our aid or our defense. Send aid to the poor people caught in the middle of this shit and stop sending weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The question isn’t why Palestinians aren’t reporting on Hamas killing someone, the question is why isn’t the West reporting on it.

Hamas killing someone is expected behavior.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

BTW. What does this story have to do with US politics?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The lack of a response is very much US Politics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Weapons. That’s the connection.

The US sends vast arsenals to Israel and Israel uses those weapons for genocide and other war crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

You couch this story like you know what happened. You don’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Are you actually claiming there was no media coverage of the murdered hostages?

There is a very good argument that the role of non mainstream news sources, like the Intercept, it to shed light on the news that mainstream media doesn’t raise.

If the CNN was blasting 24 hours the news about this American being shot, I’m pretty sure the Intercept would not bother either.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Just an observation on the nature of media and events. The Intercept is hardly mainstream. Instead of reporting facts it produces outrage purposed dribble, and this is a good example. In this case, those facts are not determined, and the US State Department is seeking them. That’s the way CNN reported it anyway. Should this turn into an Ashli Babbitt situation, the Intercept will not report it and it will not be here because it won’t suit the fashionable narrative.

On a side note, I wonder what this story has to do with US Politics. Although I do see a mod in the string who should be able to explain that, but probably won’t

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 414K

    Comments