Also why western propagandists now use the term âKremlin talking pointsâ as seen here:
Theyâre not disputing the factual accuracy of whatâs being said, theyâre just complaining that these points support Russian position.
So itâs not âdisinformation.â Very interesting to admitâŚ
The greatest propaganda of all is just saying true statements.
The people we need to think about bringing left are people who will take what we say in good faith, but who are still skeptical of it. If they wonât take it in good faith, weâre wasting time talking to them. If they arenât skeptical, theyâre already convinced.
When youâre skeptical but actually willing to look into something, exaggerations or omissions can turn you away entirely. Everyone has a threshold where they say âI canât trust this person/source anymore, Iâm going to tune out what they say even if parts of it might be true.â It takes effort to sift through bad information, and why would they bother? Youâre not reliable.
There is so much horrific stuff capitalists have done that we can stick to whatâs indisputably true, and that doesnât really have any gray areas or excuses, and convince those people who can be convinced.
disinformation
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
I am creating a new term rather than âdisinformationâ : âthisinformationâ = As in âthisinformation is not cool with me (Factually true but not cool)â.
e.g. Russians are peddling thisinformation about Ukraine.
