198 Posts
1.24K Comments
Joined 1 month
Source: https://lemmy.ml/u/UniversalMonk@lemmy.world
If it took only 10 seconds to post each time, and 20 seconds to make a comment, that means you have spent:
(198 * 10) + (1240 * 20) = 26780 seconds
Or, 7.44 hours, in one month. That’s almost 5% the amount of time people spend working full time. Almost a full work day. And these are extremely generous estimates that assume you are very fast. I have no doubt you have spent minutes responding to some of the comments calling you out.
A more realistic set of numbers would be
(198 * 30) + (1240 * 45) = 61740 seconds
Or, 17.15 hours, in one month. That’s almost 43% the amount of time people spend working full time. Over 2 full work days.
To calculate the number of times you submitted content per waking hour:
(198 + 1240) / (16 * 30) = 3
Or once every 20 minutes on average, assuming you sleep. Almost every single one promoting third party candidates. Totally and completely not sus, at all. Not even a little bit.
I don’t have to explain anything to you. But keep posting stats because I am posting more articles. Thank you!
Of course. You would only explain why you post three times per hour
- in favor of third party candidates
- suddenly, starting 3 months before the election
- increasing in frequency after the debate
- despite the massive amount of critical comments you get
If the explanation would not get you permabanned.
She’s trying so damn hard to get Trump elected lmao.
Almost as hard as OP is, whatever his name is this week.
Almost as hard as OP is, whatever his name is this week.
Not sure what you mean. I also just posted a libertarian article where he wants to take down Trump. Hmmm…
https://lemmy.world/post/19662638
Doesn’t really fit your narrative though, does it? But hey, you believe what you wanna belive. I don’t care.
To cut through the nonsense and save everyone time, especially since many in this community have a habit of resorting to personal attacks when responding to posts recently: I support and respect everyone’s right to vote for who they want to.
I’m just posting this article that’s already available on a much bigger platform than Lemmy—I didn’t write it, just sharing it for discussion.
Putin’s Jizz Stein also wants Nato disbanded, the US to give up their SC veto, and revoke weapons to help Ukraine defend itself while simultaneously forcing ‘peace’ (subjugation) negotiations with russia.
For those of you that don’t understand how the Electoral College works, voting for her means donald will be president. Have fun wasting your time reading the article.
Reported for misinformation, but I’m not seeing a problem here.
Wants NATO disbanded? Give up the Security Council vote?
https://www.jillstein2024.com/peace_platform
https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/jill-stein/policies/foreign-policy/nato
Unsupport Ukraine?
https://www.isidewith.com/candidates/jill-stein/policies/foreign-policy/ukraine
Pretty much everything you’d expect from a Putin backed candidate.
And for the record guys, I’m not the one who reported for disinformation. Just getting that out of the way now, before accusations from other posters come at me! lol
BUT I think it may be the part where the poster says “voting for her means donald will be president.”
No, voting for her doesn’t automatically mean donald will be president. I mean, he “could” be, but it’s not set in stone. That’s an opinion of the poster, not an actual fact.
But I personally think that could have been pointed out to the poster, rather than reporting for misinformation.
MSN.com - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for MSN.com:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
