A report from Morgan Stanley suggests the datacenter industry is on track to emit 2.5 billion tons by 2030, which is three times higher than the predictions if generative AI had not come into play.

The extra demand from GenAI will reportedly lead to a rise in emissions from 200 million tons this year to 600 million tons by 2030, thanks largely to the construction of more data centers to keep up with the demand for cloud services.

24 points

Fuck this “AI” shit

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Love to burn down an acre of rain forest to generate a picture of an ape.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

you wouldn’t understand “progress”

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Anything but paying for the labor of a person to draw such a picture.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

slaver mentality 101

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Or (heaven forbid) learning to draw!

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Looks like AI will eliminate any gains we have in climate change. Too bad for us.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Gotta remember that AI is going to solve the climate crisis! \s

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Over time, it is. It’s eliminating the source. In Terminator, Matrix, and others they say that the AI took a split second to act, but our AI doesn’t have those connections. It’s working with what it’s got.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It’s scary how our corporate overlords watch all the distopian films and are like: Let’s turn that into a reality!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

That already happened with Crypto.

AI will use less power over time, as hardware gets faster and we approach a ‘good enough’ level of computation power, similar to Desktops/Laptops - outside gaming, electrical power for the average desktop has only decreased since Sandy Bridge, a 2600K is still good enough for the average desktop, it can still even pull punches gaming.

Crypto, by design, will never decrease in power use and only and forever increase.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Too bad for us, yeah.

The people benefiting from this have more than enough money to stay comfortable and live a long life if the environment becomes hazardous, deadly and inimical to human life.

It’s the masses who will suffer, who will be forced to live in tiny bunkers just to survive and work for the capitalists, never going outside until an extreme weather event wipes them away despite their budget bunker

And the capitalist ruling class will say “oh look more space to expand my summer bunker”

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points
*

…and all so they can steal our collective content, creativity, and every piece of individual thought or content we’ve ever communicated online.

…with the aim of exploiting it to make billionaires richer.

permalink
report
reply
-12 points

This is only relevant to closed source AI. Not all AI is closed

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Still, open source AI will still help the same companies getting richer because the needed computing power can be found in these data centers. The companies don’t even care if it’s AI, crypto or whatever the next thing is, as long as it needs lots of power and bandwidth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I don’t care if our open source tools are used by rich people. That’s kinda the point. Everyone can use them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

U.S. vehicles currently emit 2 billion tons. So that’s very bad news.

However – I think 2030 is waaay too far in the future to predict anything about AI.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 4K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 44K

    Comments

Community moderators